Repository navigation
docs(memory): close semantic memory docs - #662
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 50 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates documentation only, revising the architecture doc's Memory Grounding section, promoting ADR-0072 and ADR-0073 from Proposed to Accepted with updated decisions and acceptance checklists, and adding a new Semantic Memory section to the topic layer usage guide. ChangesMemory and semantic memory documentation
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@coding-agent/docs/CODING-AGENT-ARCHITECTURE.md`:
- Around line 967-973: Update the SemanticMemoryPlugin registration note to
reflect the real gate in app setup: it is only registered when semantic memory
is enabled and effective memory read is on, not by [memory.semantic].enabled
alone. In the architecture doc section describing SemanticMemoryPlugin and the
backend adapters, clarify that the registration behavior follows the logic in
coding_agent/core/app.py and aligns with the read-disabled expectation so
operators do not treat the semantic toggle as independent from the memory read
switch.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: fedfda6c-873b-42d5-9612-df084eab7e99
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
coding-agent/docs/CODING-AGENT-ARCHITECTURE.mdcoding-agent/docs/adr/0072-tape-memory-semantic-index-and-enable-switch.mdcoding-agent/docs/adr/0073-sqlite-topic-store-parity.mdcoding-agent/docs/topic_layer/USAGE.md
Summary
Verification
git diff --check -- docs/adr/0072-tape-memory-semantic-index-and-enable-switch.md docs/adr/0073-sqlite-topic-store-parity.md docs/topic_layer/USAGE.md docs/CODING-AGENT-ARCHITECTURE.mduv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_topic_store_contract.py tests/coding_agent/test_topic_store.py tests/coding_agent/test_sqlite_topic_store.py tests/coding_agent/test_sqlite_local_durable_fencing.py tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py tests/coding_agent/test_runtime_preparation.py tests/ui/test_http_server.py tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_maintenance.py tests/deploy/test_helm_chart.py tests/coding_agent/test_memory_switch.py tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_recall.py --collect-only -quv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_recall.py -k "current_query or derived_current_query or deterministic_topics_stay_first or semantic_refill" -quv run pytest tests/deploy/test_helm_chart.py -k "memory_semantic or semantic_memory or defer_when_semantic_memory_hits or local_sqlite_topic_store_path" -quv run pytest tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py::test_sqlite_durable_semantic_rebuild_recalled_by_later_build_context_without_backend_hit_text -quv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_maintenance.py -k "factory or topic_store_available or rebuild_requires_topic_store" -qSummary by CodeRabbit