Parser throwing exception #154

Activity

1. rjb4standards commented on Dec 20, 2020

   

   rjb4standards

   on Dec 20, 2020

   Author

   More actions

   Gary, I was able to get a successful validation with the online validator for https://github.com/rjb4standards/REA-Products/blob/master/SAG-PM.spdx
   However, I'm seeing these errors from the python parser for the same file:
   PackageChecksum must be a single line of text, line: 15
   false
   Only one PackageName allowed, extra at line: 22

   Any suggestions on how to get around this?
2. goneall commented on Dec 20, 2020

   

   goneall

   on Dec 20, 2020

   Member

   More actions

   Ahhh - the Python Parser - Now everything makes sense.

   The Python Parser is maintained in a different repo, I'll move this issue over.

   You can disregard my above comments.

   I'll leave it up to the maintainers of the Python project to respond to the issues.

   In the interim, you can use the online tools at https://tools.spdx.org/app/ for validating the SPDX file.

   Once you have a validated file, give it a try using the Python parsers.
3. goneall

   transferred this issue fromspdx/toolson Dec 20, 2020
4. rjb4standards commented on Mar 1, 2021

   

   rjb4standards

   on Mar 1, 2021

   Author

   More actions

   I found the culprit for this error too: PackageChecksum must be a single line of text, line: 15
   LOOKS LIKE SHA256 not supported, only SHA1 allowed:

   15: PackageChecksum: SHA256: aaa5ac584f40fe778013df0aa6544bf157799bd3f608364b451840ed2c8688de

   def checksum_from_sha1(value):
   """
   Return an spdx.checksum.Algorithm instance representing the SHA1
   checksum or None if does not match CHECKSUM_RE.
   """
   # More constrained regex at lexer level
   CHECKSUM_RE = re.compile("SHA1:\s([\S]+)", re.UNICODE)*
   match = CHECKSUM_RE.match(value)
   if match:
   return checksum.Algorithm(identifier="SHA1", value=match.group(1))
   else:
   return None
5. meretp commented on Oct 14, 2022

   

   meretp

   on Oct 14, 2022

   Collaborator

   More actions

   related to #185
6. nicoweidner

   added

   parserIssues related to the parser layerIssues related to the parser layer

   on Oct 20, 2022
7. meretp commented on Nov 28, 2022

   

   meretp

   on Nov 28, 2022

   Collaborator

   More actions

   Closing this issue as it should be solved with #311. Please reopen, if this is not the case.
8. meretp

   closed this as completedon Nov 28, 2022