Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2026. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 8, 2026. It is now read-only.

samples.samples.snippets_test: many tests failed #437

Closed

Description

@flaky-bot

Many tests failed at the same time in this package.

  • I will close this issue when there are no more failures in this package and
    there is at least one pass.
  • No new issues will be filed for this package until this issue is closed.
  • If there are already issues for individual test cases, I will close them when
    the corresponding test passes. You can close them earlier, if you prefer, and
    I won't reopen them while this issue is still open.

Here are the tests that failed:

  • test_create_instance
  • test_create_database
  • test_create_database_with_encryption_config
  • test_insert_data
  • test_delete_data
  • test_query_data
  • test_add_column
  • test_read_data
  • test_update_data
  • test_read_stale_data
  • test_read_write_transaction
  • test_query_data_with_new_column
  • test_add_index (samples.samples.snippets_test: test_add_index failed #403)
  • test_query_data_with_index (samples.samples.snippets_test: test_query_data_with_index failed #404)
  • test_read_data_with_index (samples.samples.snippets_test: test_read_data_with_index failed #405)
  • test_add_storing_index
  • test_read_data_with_storing_index
  • test_read_only_transaction
  • test_add_timestamp_column
  • test_update_data_with_timestamp
  • test_query_data_with_timestamp
  • test_create_table_with_timestamp
  • test_insert_data_with_timestamp
  • test_write_struct_data
  • test_query_with_struct
  • test_query_with_array_of_struct
  • test_query_struct_field
  • test_query_nested_struct_field
  • test_insert_data_with_dml
  • test_log_commit_stats
  • test_update_data_with_dml
  • test_delete_data_with_dml
  • test_update_data_with_dml_timestamp
  • test_dml_write_read_transaction
  • test_update_data_with_dml_struct
  • test_insert_with_dml
  • test_query_data_with_parameter
  • test_write_with_dml_transaction
  • test_create_table_with_datatypes
  • test_insert_datatypes_data
  • test_query_data_with_array
  • test_query_data_with_bool
  • test_query_data_with_bytes
  • test_query_data_with_date
  • test_query_data_with_float
  • test_query_data_with_int
  • test_query_data_with_string
  • test_add_numeric_column
  • test_update_data_with_numeric
  • test_query_data_with_numeric_parameter
  • test_query_data_with_timestamp_parameter
  • test_query_data_with_query_options
  • test_create_client_with_query_options (samples.samples.snippets_test: test_create_client_with_query_options failed #406)

commit: 2487800
buildURL: Build Status, Sponge
status: failed

Activity

  1. added
    flakybot: issueAn issue filed by the Flaky Bot. Should not be added manually.
    priority: p1Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release.
    type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
    on Jul 29, 2021
  2. added
    api: spannerIssues related to the googleapis/python-spanner API.
    samplesIssues that are directly related to samples.
    on Jul 29, 2021
  3. larkee commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @larkee
    Contributor

    @tseaver All of the samples and system tests are suddenly timing out. Looks related to: #427

    Is this an issue in other libraries? I need to do a release so I'd like to either resolve the issue or revert that change. WDYT?

  4. tseaver commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @tseaver
    Contributor

    I know that we have reverted / disable always_use_jwt_access PRs in other libraries (googleapis/python-bigquery#722, googleapis/python-bigtable#348), in some cases followed by a different enabling PR (googleapis/python-bigtable#397). That latter PR, however, looks a lot like our #427. :(

  5. tseaver commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @tseaver
    Contributor

    At least some of the failures I'm seeing are due to timeouts in instance creation, exceeding 120 seconds. Do we have some way to ask the back-end folks if they have had recent lags in provisioning instances?

  6. tseaver commented on Jul 29, 2021

    @tseaver
    Contributor

    The multiple snippets failures may be due to insufficient dependencies (or I implemented the pytest-dependency bits wrong). They do all seem to be either timeouts (for instance creation) or NotFound errors for the instance / database being used.

  7. added
    type: processA process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.
    and removed
    priority: p1Important issue which blocks shipping the next release. Will be fixed prior to next release.
    type: bugError or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
    on Jul 29, 2021
  8. flaky-bot commented on Jul 30, 2021

    @flaky-bot
    Author

    Test passed for commit 89fe076 (Build Status, Sponge)! Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

api: spannerIssues related to the googleapis/python-spanner API.flakybot: issueAn issue filed by the Flaky Bot. Should not be added manually.samplesIssues that are directly related to samples.type: processA process-related concern. May include testing, release, or the like.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions