Skip to content

hangman: implement exercise #745

Closed
Closed

Description

@ilya-khadykin

There are exercises that are not yet implemented in Python track (the full list of them - #417 (comment)).
You can help us change this situation by implementing this one. Ref #417

The guide "Implement an exercise from specification" will help you succeed.

If you still have questions, I encourage you to ask them before starting working on the issue.

I also suggest claiming the issue by creating an empty PR as stated here

Please note that there are some special 'closing issue' keywords that you can put in description of your PR and Github will take care of closing the corresponding issue automatically after merge.
This simple thing helps us a lot, and makes our life a bit easier

Activity

  1. vaibhavsingh97 commented on Oct 6, 2017

    @vaibhavsingh97

    can i take up this issue?

  2. ilya-khadykin commented on Oct 6, 2017

    @ilya-khadykin
    ContributorAuthor
  3. stale commented on Nov 23, 2017

    @stale

    This issue has been automatically marked as abandoned because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

  4. khoa102 commented on Jan 9, 2018

    @khoa102

    Hi, I wonder if I can take up this issues as my first contribution for open source?

  5. cmccandless commented on Jan 9, 2018

    @cmccandless
    Contributor

    @khoa102 Absolutely! Issues can be claimed by creating a PR for them. Please remember to put Fixes #745 in the PR description to link the PR to this issue.

  6. khoa102 commented on Jan 10, 2018

    @khoa102
  7. khoa102 commented on Jan 12, 2018

    @khoa102

    Hi, can anyone take a look at the PR for this issue that I submit a few day ago? I would also want to know what should I put for the config of this exercise, like the difficulty, unlock or topic?

  8. anshima1 commented on Oct 2, 2018

    @anshima1

    Hey is this issue solved? If not, I'll like to work on it.

  9. cmccandless commented on Oct 2, 2018

    @cmccandless
    Contributor

    @anshima1 No, this issue is not yet resolved.

    If you wish to work on this, I highly suggest reviewing the discussion in #1160.

  10. junming403 commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @junming403
    Contributor

    Hi is this issue still relevant? I would like to work on it. Do i need to open an PR to claim it first?

  11. cmccandless commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @cmccandless
    Contributor

    @junming403 It is still relevant, yes.

    Also, as stated above:

    If you wish to work on this, I highly suggest reviewing the discussion in #1160.

  12. junming403 commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @junming403
    Contributor

    Hi thank you for the prompt response! I have looked at the thread of discussion. Notice it did not use FRP, I am considering make this exercise based on FRP library(http://reactivex.io/intro.html). What should do if the exercise rely on the library? Any guidance?

  13. cmccandless commented on Feb 26, 2019

    @cmccandless
    Contributor

    RE: the track README

    We use unittest (Python Standard Library) and no 3rd-party-framework.

    It would be preferable that we stick to that.

  14. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 4, 2019
    85ff734
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions