Repository navigation
Should we forgo any missing exercises #417
Description
Right now there are 36 exercises that are not yet part of the python track. Besides implementing or finishing those, there is also the option (config.json#L465) to decide not to implement certain problems if they don't make sense for this track.
- markdown
- bank-account
- pov
- tournament
- dot-dsl
- connect
- two-bucket
- sgf-parsing
- zipper
- ledger
- nucleotide-codons
- simple-linked-list dibs: implement simple-linked-list #385
- forth
- binary-search-tree dibs: implement binary-search-tree #388
- scale-generator
- tree-building
- error-handling
- transpose
- react
- parallel-letter-frequency
- hangman
- variable-length-quantity
- alphametics
- custom-set
- diffie-hellman
- change
- protein-translation
- counter
- lens-person
- go-counting
- word-search
- bowling
- dominoes
- food-chain
- paasio
Activity
[-]Implement or forgo missing exercises[/-][+]Should we forgo any missing exercises[/+]skabbass1 commentedon Aug 18, 2017
@behrtam
Are you still looking for contributions on this issue ( implementing the 36 exercises not part of the python track). Also just curious to know why you think certain problems don't make sense for the python track (I haven't looked through all the exercises so just asking for my information :) )
devkabiir commentedon Oct 3, 2017
@behrtam I can contribute binary-search-tree exercise should I open a new issue for it or reference the closed one #388 in my PR
I'm interested in learning all the other exercises yet to be implemented and then contributing them.
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 3, 2017
@kabiir, that is awesome.
I'm planning to open issues for these exercises as part of Hacktoberfest. Will it work for you?
devkabiir commentedon Oct 3, 2017
@M-a-Ge Yes of course! I'm excited to start coding.
cmccandless commentedon Oct 6, 2017
I've implemented
dominoesat #726.ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 6, 2017
Updated list of not yet implemented exercises excluding deprecated ones and those which were implemented since Feb 22 (24 in total):
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 6, 2017
@kabiir I've created issues as promised 😉
thecouchcoder commentedon Oct 10, 2017
Is Bowling deprecated? It's on the unimplemented list, but I don't see an issue for it. If it's up for grabs I can do it when I finish my current PR.
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 10, 2017
@aes421 hm, looks like I've missed that exercise somehow.
Feel free to open a new PR any time (there is no need to wait until your other PRs are merged). Only make sure you'll use different branch based on
upstream/masterwhen you start working.Link to Problem Specification for the exercise - https://github.com/exercism/problem-specifications/tree/master/exercises/bowling
cmccandless commentedon Feb 15, 2018
Updated list of unimplemented exercises:
affine-cipherpythonmite commentedon Jan 4, 2019
Hello Team,
Can you please confirm whether affine-cipher exercise has been solved or not. if not I would like to present a solution for the same.
cmccandless commentedon Jan 4, 2019
@pythonmite
affine-cipherhas already been implemented.If you are still interested in contributing here, please check our list of open issues.
andrefpoliveira commentedon Oct 16, 2020
Hey! I would like to implement a new exercise. But I don't know Passio. Can you explain? Thank you!
cmccandless commentedon Oct 17, 2020
Hi @andrefpoliveira !
Actually we just merged #2195, which implements
passio. And there is an open PR for hangman which was placed on hold by the maintainers. However...We have a great deal of work still needed for our new Concept exercises. By the launch of v3, they will be relocated to this repository, but for now, they are being developed for all language tracks here: https://github.com/exercism/v3. We would greatly appreciate contribution there! If you wish to keep to the Python track, simply look at the open issues here: https://github.com/exercism/v3/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc++python.
cmccandless commentedon Oct 17, 2020
Regarding this issue: all unimplemented issues from problem-specifications have either been implemented or put on hold, so this issue will be closed.