Repository navigation
binary-search-tree: implement exercise #740
Description
There are exercises that are not yet implemented in Python track (the full list of them - #417 (comment)).
You can help us change this situation by implementing this one. Ref #417
The guide "Implement an exercise from specification" will help you succeed.
If you still have questions, I encourage you to ask them before starting working on the issue.
I also suggest claiming the issue by creating an empty PR as stated here
Please note that there are some special 'closing issue' keywords that you can put in description of your PR and Github will take care of closing the corresponding issue automatically after merge.
This simple thing helps us a lot, and makes our life a bit easier
Activity
[-]binary-search-tree #388: implement exercise[/-][+]binary-search-tree: implement exercise[/+]ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 6, 2017
#388 can be useful
rodrigocam commentedon Oct 8, 2017
I'm working on it!
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 8, 2017
@rodrigocam, I suggest creating an empty [WIP] PR - https://github.com/exercism/docs/blob/master/you-can-help/implement-an-exercise-from-specification.md#avoiding-duplicate-work to claim it
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 8, 2017
@rodrigocam ah, I see, you've done that, but forgot to add a reference to this issue in order to add visibility. I strongly recommend always doing it, it saves a lot of time.
Please also note that there are some special 'closing issue' keywords that you can put in description of your PR and Github will take care of closing the corresponding issue automatically after merge.
It makes our work much easier. I hope this hint will help you to make your future PRs a bit better
rodrigocam commentedon Oct 8, 2017
Alright, thanks! Which methods do you want in the binary search tree? I create an insert method and preorder, inorder and postorder traversals.
rodrigocam commentedon Oct 8, 2017
I made a pull request with the implementation, please take a look!
ilya-khadykin commentedon Oct 9, 2017
@rodrigocam thanks! You've created two PRs #773 and #768. Could you please close one to avoid confusion.
It's up to you
rodrigocam commentedon Oct 9, 2017
Ok, sorry. I closed one of them, please take a look (: