Skip to content

100% Test coverage #26

Closed
Closed

Description

@lovelydinosaur

Let's get the test coverage up to 100%, and then force-pin it.

Any contributions towards this are welcome.

Activity

  1. yeraydiazdiaz commented on May 14, 2019

    @yeraydiazdiaz
    Contributor

    The merged PRs and #64 is as much as I've been able to increase the coverage, the report on that branch is as follows:

    + venv/bin/coverage report -m
    Name                                      Stmts   Miss  Cover   Missing
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    httpcore/__init__.py                         10      0   100%
    httpcore/client.py                          132      0   100%
    httpcore/concurrency.py                      90      3    97%   79, 93-94
    httpcore/config.py                           88      0   100%
    httpcore/decoders.py                         63      0   100%
    httpcore/dispatch/__init__.py                 0      0   100%
    httpcore/dispatch/connection.py              58      0   100%
    httpcore/dispatch/connection_pool.py         96      3    97%   78-80
    httpcore/dispatch/http11.py                  73      3    96%   69, 100-103
    httpcore/dispatch/http2.py                   91      0   100%
    httpcore/exceptions.py                       17      0   100%
    httpcore/interfaces.py                       36      0   100%
    httpcore/models.py                          482      0   100%
    httpcore/status_codes.py                      2      0   100%
    httpcore/utils.py                            22      0   100%
    tests/client/test_async_client.py            72      0   100%
    tests/client/test_client.py                  86      0   100%
    tests/client/test_redirects.py              158      0   100%
    tests/conftest.py                            49      0   100%
    tests/dispatch/__init__.py                    0      0   100%
    tests/dispatch/test_connection_pools.py      68      0   100%
    tests/dispatch/test_connections.py           20      0   100%
    tests/dispatch/test_http2.py                 32      0   100%
    tests/dispatch/utils.py                      58      0   100%
    tests/models/test_headers.py                 94      0   100%
    tests/models/test_queryparams.py             26      0   100%
    tests/models/test_requests.py                61      0   100%
    tests/models/test_responses.py              113      0   100%
    tests/models/test_url.py                     23      0   100%
    tests/test_config.py                         56      0   100%
    tests/test_decoders.py                       59      0   100%
    tests/test_timeouts.py                       19      0   100%
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    TOTAL                                      2254      9    99%
    
    • httpcore/dispatch/http11.py 73 3 96% 69, 100-103
      • Line 69 covers receiving an informational response which I haven't been able to reproduce from our server fixture.
      • Lines 100-103: Close with H11 protocol error, I've tried manually reproducing an error but it would require reaching into the connection pool and manually closing the connection simply to trigger a pass, I'd say it's a candidate for pragma: nocover
    • httpcore/concurrency.py 90 3 97% 79, 93-94
      • Line 79: Covers the Writer.write_no_block method, which I'm not sure what it does or how to reproduce it.
      • Lines 93-94: Handles an exception on stream_writer.drain to raise a WriteTimeout, I don't know how to recreate its conditions in a test.
    • httpcore/dispatch/connection_pool.py 96 3 97% 78-80
      • Lines 78-80: are the body of ConnectionStore.__getitem__ which I'm not clear on what it does as it seems to return the key if it's in the store or None otherwise, which seems like a membership test?

    Any pointers?

  2. lovelydinosaur commented on May 14, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    Stonkin great work here!
    Sending an Expect : 100-continue header ought to trigger Uvicorn to issue a 100 informational response. That’d knock off one more!

  3. lovelydinosaur commented on May 14, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    I think closing a steaming response without reading it should trigger the h11 protocol error case, but I’m not 100% without reviewing it more thoroughly.

  4. lovelydinosaur commented on May 14, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    For the WriteTimeout, try sending a large request in test_timeouts.py, to the slow_response endpoint, using a tiny write timeout.

  5. yeraydiazdiaz commented on May 15, 2019

    @yeraydiazdiaz
    Contributor

    Awesome, thanks for the tips! I'll try those out (in separate PRs) today 👍

  6. lovelydinosaur commented on May 15, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    Rad.

  7. lovelydinosaur commented on May 16, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    @yeraydiazdiaz Final remaining line here is in write_no_block. We use that interface in the HTTP/2 case in order to strictly write the HTTP/2 connection initialization, without allowing for any race conditions of "we've hit an async/await, so the task switched out under us, and wrote some different data first".

    Because uvicorn doesn't currently have HTTP/2 support we're only ever testing out against a mock HTTP/2 server implementation, and we're never hitting that line.

    I'm just going to pragma: nocover it for now as unreachable in test.

  8. lovelydinosaur commented on May 16, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    Thanks so much for your help on this!

  9. yeraydiazdiaz commented on May 16, 2019

    @yeraydiazdiaz
    Contributor

    No worries, glad we could get it done 🎉

  10. lovelydinosaur commented on May 16, 2019

    @lovelydinosaur
    MemberAuthor

    🤩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    help wantedExtra attention is needed

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions