[delete-cloud]

Summary

• add a task packet for the SQLite durable semantic recall proof slice
• add a product-level regression covering SQLite durable TopicStore -> semantic rebuild -> later build_context recall
• verify semantic recall renders the authoritative durable topic summary instead of backend hit text

Tests

• uv run pytest tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py::test_sqlite_durable_semantic_rebuild_recalled_by_later_build_context_without_backend_hit_text -q
• uv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_maintenance.py tests/coding_agent/plugins/test_semantic_memory.py -q
• uv run pytest tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py -k "selected_topic_store or semantic_topic_store or semantic_memory" -q
• uv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_sqlite_local_durable_fencing.py -k "selected_topic_store or topic_store or semantic" -q
• uv run pytest tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_recall.py tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_sync.py tests/coding_agent/test_semantic_tape_index.py -q
• uv run ruff check tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py && uv run ruff format --check tests/ui/test_session_manager_runtime.py
• git diff --check

Local review

• subagent review found one P2 in the task packet review policy; fixed in 989691e
• follow-up subagent review: No P1/P2 findings.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated review guidance for the design-sensitive workflow, adjusting which severity levels are considered actionable.
  • Kept the same fix-and-retest instruction after accepted findings.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 09192bcf-c55f-4cea-8475-63efea5eaea7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6947471 and 239fab9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• coding-agent/.opencode/prompts/tasks/tape-memory-sqlite-recall-e2e-task-packet.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates the tape-memory SQLite recall task packet’s loop policy so reviewer findings are limited to P1/P2 instead of P0/P1, while the engineer fix-and-rerun instruction stays the same.

Changes

Loop policy prompt update

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Loop policy threshold change coding-agent/.opencode/prompts/tasks/tape-memory-sqlite-recall-e2e-task-packet.md	The loop policy text changes the allowed reviewer finding severity from P0/P1 to P1/P2 and keeps the engineer rerun instruction unchanged.

Estimated review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• delete-cloud/Coding-Agent-Loop#636: Updates the same tape-memory SQLite recall task packet and loop-policy text around the same workflow.

Poem

I’m a little rabbit, quick and bright,
Hopping through prompts by morning light.
P1, P2—now that’s the tune,
Fix, rerun, and leap at noon. 🐇

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title is concise and aligned with the PR’s SQLite semantic recall coverage, which is the main change area.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch test/sqlite-semantic-recall-e2e

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}