Skip to content

Inline Spec File - #129

Merged
grant merged 3 commits into
cloudevents:masterfrom
grant:grant_inline_spec
May 6, 2020
Merged

grant merged 3 commits into
cloudevents:masterfrom
grant:grant_inline_spec

Conversation

@grant

@grant grant commented May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR inlines the spec file and deletes the ext folder. In the future, we can use a more sophisticated way of managing multiple spec versions.

lance and others added 2 commits May 5, 2020 21:59
…loudevents#118)

The Knative Kafka event source does not include a `Content-Type` header when
sending binary events. The CE HTTP binding specification doesn't address how
a receiver should handle this situation.

This commit makes `application/json` the default.

Fixes: cloudevents#117
Ref: cloudevents/spec#614

Signed-off-by: Lance Ball <lball@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Timmerman <timmerman+devrel@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Grant Timmerman <timmerman+devrel@google.com>

@lance lance left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Inlining the spec file looks fine. I'm curious what you have in mind for more sophisticated methods for handling multiple versions.

It seems like you have inadvertently pulled in a commit that has already landed 5b747ee. Can you remove this from the PR?

… mode (cloudevents#118)"

This reverts commit 9ccfaf2.

Signed-off-by: Grant Timmerman <timmerman+devrel@google.com>
@grant
grant force-pushed the grant_inline_spec branch from b9bd2a7 to b147bec Compare May 6, 2020 19:00
@grant

grant commented May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Inlining the spec file looks fine.

Great.

It seems like you have inadvertently pulled in a commit that has already landed 5b747ee. Can you remove this from the PR?

Yes, removed.

@grant
grant merged commit 106b943 into cloudevents:master May 6, 2020
@lance lance mentioned this pull request May 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants