Skip to content

[Idea]: Deepseek support? #12

Open

Description

@luckydevil13

What problem would this solve?

any plans?

Proposed improvement

will be nice to have

Alternatives and tradeoffs

No response

Activity

  1. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 7, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    Hi @luckydevil13 ! There are few problems and reasons why no or not yet.
    First: goal of this project is "Strata for all Qwen models"
    Second: current best deepseek V4.1 has 552b Total params, 8B active for prefill and 16B for answer and this is make deveplloping and testing this model way harder then small Qwen models
    Third: Qwen3.8 Flash Next is better or equal to Deepseek, even tho QFN is 3 times smaller!
    So what is the point of deepseek?
    I think about adding 1-2 big models, I still think which one, but I guess it will be not deepseek, if you got any other suggestions, I will be happy to hear it!

  2. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 7, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    and btw I will add you in THANKS.md, since you helped with benchmarks and also Ideas!

  3. luckydevil13 commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @luckydevil13
    Author

    @Vasyl-Trefilov take a look at https://huggingface.co/ISTA-DASLab/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-GSQ-RCO-GGUF , they say With Strata, every build runs on a single GPU with 12 GB of VRAM. See Usage.

    I like lightweght of this project.
    BTW I have 128Gb ram ) It's hard to add ds4 support? Could I try to do it with Sol 6.1? how did you think?

  4. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 Hi, I will take a look in this project and think about deepseek again and write you in 30-50min back.
    Also about your idea, ofc you can try it with Sol6.1, just create PR and I will review it after you finish, to make sure that everything is correct.
    Thanks for idea again!

  5. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13, I took a look at it and also searched for some other bigger models that can fit in your ram and can actually make sense and I don't think that anything will make sense, maybe only GLM-5.3-Flash. If you like this model, I can try implement it

  6. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    Also MiniMax M3.1 Flash looks interesting

  7. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    But I think we need just wait from Qwen4 models that will come out very soon

  8. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Nov 8, 2026
  9. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 8, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 I hope you are happy, bc I am adding DeepSeekV4.1 1017 in Strata, I will tag you when it's ready, it can take few days, since it has different architecture from Qwen models

  10. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 9, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 hey, it's implemented, I got Reddit post about it https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xr2v59/comment/19scehy72txfl/?screen_view_count=3 I tested Deepseek only on one quant, but it must work on others too, so you can try it out, I will be very happy to get some feedback from you

  11. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 10, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 also GLM5.3 Flash support will be released today, with your 128GB ram Q2-Q3 GLM5.3 Flash will be way better then DeepSeekV4.1 1017. For now it perform 3-4 times faster then on llama.cpp, but maybe this is bc I need to read weights from SSD, bc I don't have so much RAM as you do. But you can expect like 8-15t/s which is pretty nice for 330B model

  12. luckydevil13 commented on Nov 11, 2026

    @luckydevil13
    Author

    @luckydevil13 hey, it's implemented, I got Reddit post about it https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1xr2v59/comment/19scehy72txfl/?screen_view_count=3 I tested Deepseek only on one quant, but it must work on others too, so you can try it out, I will be very happy to get some feedback from you

    Huge thanks,
    But seems not works for Vulkan backend . catch CUDA :(

    [root@BIG RustingStrata]# ./target/release/rustingstrata generate --model $M  --gpu --backend vulkan --device 0,1  --prompt "The capital of France is"
    cuda device 0: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti, sm_120
    cuda shared memory: opt-in 101376 B per block, attn_decode_gqa*: 2112 B static, dynamic max 73728 B, carveout default
    cuda shared memory: opt-in 101376 B per block, attn_prefill_*: 0 B static, dynamic max 72704 B, carveout default
    cuda shared memory: opt-in 101376 B per block, gemvn_*: 0 B static, dynamic max 101376 B, carveout default
     Paris.  The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog^C
    [root@BIG RustingStrata]# ./target/release/rustingstrata -V
    rustingstrata 1.2.1
    
    
  13. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 11, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 yes, Vulkan was not supported, but now it is, so pls pull from main and try again

  14. Vasyl-Trefilov commented on Nov 11, 2026

    @Vasyl-Trefilov
    Member

    @luckydevil13 Also, what do you think about GLM5.3 Flash as I said above, this should looking interesting for your hardware

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions