Repository navigation
Add the security-review catalogue Step - #1487
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Oct 27, 2026
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Ticket runs and Custom processes share the review Step and Delivery's hold policy.
Closes #1461
Test seams
thirdshift process <name>) with real Git, fake GitHub and fake Harnesses, as agreed in Spec: the Ticket run as a Built-in process file #1456.Evidence
security-reviewwas not a catalogue value.After: CLI coverage exercises config/flag selection, skips, placement refusals, configured and explicit Harnesses, fallback, and merge holds.
showregression returned one review trace instead of two.After: both exact commands pass; both tests are retained, every outcome is published, and each review remains discoverable.
security-reviewandno-security-reviewreturn usage errors.After: the reviewer's exact regression passes; bare words remain Process names, and dashed flags work before the name.
cargo fmt --checkandcargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warningspass./usr/bin/time -p scripts/affected-tests origin/issue-1456: 51 site tests passed. The local Rust run stopped after 310 passes ongithub::history_freezes_do_not_wake_an_unchanged_inbox(unchanged read woke the Inbox); that unchanged test passed directly and in five further consecutive runs. The selector took 725.44s wall, including compilation.a03c9d68: CI passed, 3,293 passed, 74 skipped; 655.102s execution plus 35.43s compilation. This successful CI result is reused rather than repeating the full suite on the same head. The CI run also passed formatting, clippy, site and Console checks.Merge Danger
Door: two-way
Blast Radius: Delivery
Shared review and hold handling affects Ticket runs and Custom processes; no data migration.
Unaddressed findings
Standards
None. The one finding (duplicated Security-hold policy) was addressed with a shared review-aware Delivery operation.
Spec
None. All three findings (lost earlier holds, missing review traces in
show, and shadowed Process names) were reproduced with the reviewers' exact commands, fixed, and kept as regression tests.Security
None.
Security review outcome
No unaddressed introduced findings.
Review coverage
Reviewed against
issue-1456, including an independent reconciliation review after #1459 landed, pinned atf21175a26b908f5daf76b578687618a57cb7db76. Cumulative findings: Standards 1, Spec 3. All are addressed.Both axes' final files-read lists cover all 17 changed files. Unread changed files: none. No generated output was excluded from reading.
Reports and final files-read lists are retained in
.thirdshift-review-s3KxT3/standards.md,spec.md, andsummary.jsonin the Session worktree.Built with codex codex-cli 0.164.0 · gpt-6.1-sol · xhigh