Repository navigation
Create sample format guidelines for Python-docs-samples #2565
Description
The python reviewer group required to approve PRs has only 4 people, be nice to expand that quickly.
Also probably having a canonical sample in Python that is agreed upon would be nice too! (To protobuf or to dictionary that is the question, I vote protobuf objects)
Activity
leahecole commentedon Nov 20, 2019
Agreed re the group. It won't just be the 4 of us forever, but might be through Thanksgiving at least.
For canonical sample, also agreed! In fact, we actually have had a PR open for awhile regarding this, and it's something that is in the backlog. #1756
nnegrey commentedon Nov 20, 2019
Yea, wasn't sure if Alix's sample was still the most up to date.
andrewferlitsch commentedon Dec 3, 2019
@nnegrey. This seems to be about internal process (not issue). Can we close this?
nnegrey commentedon Dec 3, 2019
No, I'd prefer this is left open until resolved.
[-]Expand number of Python Reviewers[/-][+]Create sample format guidelines for Python-docs-samples[/+]kurtisvg commentedon Dec 4, 2019
Reassigning this to Doug, since he volunteered to write a sample format guide similar to Java's.
If anyone else is interested in becoming a python-samples-owner, let me know and I'll loop you in on the meeting.
andrewferlitsch commentedon Mar 17, 2020
@dmahugh PTAL
leahecole commentedon Apr 2, 2020
This is still ongoing and being talked about behind the scenes. #2728 is in progress