Skip to content

GetBlock told us their endpoints are Enterprise and we wrote Starter - #2900

Merged
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
worktree-getblock-plan-fix
Oct 8, 2026
Merged

Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
worktree-getblock-plan-fix

Conversation

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Third correction in the same disclosure block this week, and the third time it came from the provider rather than from us. GetBlock says the endpoints they gave us sit on their Enterprise plan. Nine specs said "a Starter plan, 50M CU per month, 20 CU per call".

before : GetBlock: a Starter plan, 50M CU per month shared by the three
         probe regions, 20 CU per call
after  : GetBlock: an endpoint on the Enterprise plan, shared by the three
         probe regions
tag    : Starter plan, 50M CU per month, plan disclosed
      -> Enterprise plan endpoint provided, plan disclosed

The quota goes rather than being restated under the new plan name. Those figures describe Starter, nobody told us what the Enterprise allowance is, and inventing one would repeat the mistake being corrected. What survives is the part that matters for reading the numbers: the probe regions share one account, so they share whatever the limit is. The two-region specs (arc, robinhood) keep their own count.

GetBlock joins the provision sentence: "Chainstack, GetBlock and QuickNode provided their endpoints." Three of the four keyed providers handed us access; only Alchemy is a signup any reader can repeat, which is the distinction this block exists to draw.

The bullet lands at 483 characters against the 500 ceiling, with room back because the quota left.

9 specs. pnpm validate 246 specs.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Third correction in the same disclosure block, and the third time it came
from the provider rather than from us. GetBlock says the endpoints they gave
us sit on their Enterprise plan; nine specs said "a Starter plan, 50M CU per
month, 20 CU per call".

The quota goes with it rather than being restated under the new plan name.
Those figures describe Starter, nobody told us what the Enterprise allowance
is, and inventing one would repeat the mistake being corrected. What survives
is the part that matters for reading the numbers: the probe regions share a
single account, so they share whatever the limit is.

GetBlock joins the provision sentence. Three of the four keyed providers
handed us access; only Alchemy is a signup any reader can repeat, which is
the distinction that block exists to draw.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier merged commit f07eec8 into dev Oct 8, 2026
2 checks passed
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier deleted the worktree-getblock-plan-fix branch October 8, 2026 19:23
Flotapponnier added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2026
…2900) (#2901)

Third correction in the same disclosure block, and the third time it came
from the provider rather than from us. GetBlock says the endpoints they gave
us sit on their Enterprise plan; nine specs said "a Starter plan, 50M CU per
month, 20 CU per call".

The quota goes with it rather than being restated under the new plan name.
Those figures describe Starter, nobody told us what the Enterprise allowance
is, and inventing one would repeat the mistake being corrected. What survives
is the part that matters for reading the numbers: the probe regions share a
single account, so they share whatever the limit is.

GetBlock joins the provision sentence. Three of the four keyed providers
handed us access; only Alchemy is a signup any reader can repeat, which is
the distinction that block exists to draw.

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant