Skip to content

two benches went public still telling readers they were Solana only - #2854

Merged
Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/chain-aware-copy
Oct 7, 2026
Merged

Flotapponnier merged 1 commit into
devfrom
fix/chain-aware-copy

Conversation

@Flotapponnier

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

#2846 gave benches 206 and 207 an all-chains default view, and #2852 renamed them off the solana- prefix. The renaming stopped at the title. The body did not move, so both pages shipped to production saying:

  • "leads Solana terminals with …"
  • "routed Solana volume divided by that day's swap count"
  • "on Solana on the day" — in every one of the eighteen provider formulas

A page contradicting its own tab strip, in front of readers, on the figure it exists to publish. I verified the slugs, the tabs, the logos and the links after shipping, and did not re-read the prose.

Fixed across seo_description, disclaimer, seo_intro, methodology, findings, the FAQ and all eighteen formulas.

207's "Is this Solana only?" FAQ was the wrong question once the answer became no. It now answers how to read one chain at a time, which is what someone looking at eight tabs actually wants to know.

Three mentions of Solana stay in each, and all three are true: the methodology line about BasedBot routing on Robinhood Chain and almost nothing on Solana, and the tags on Trojan and Photon, which really are Solana-only products.

Needs cherry-picking to main after this merges — the wrong copy is live there now.

pnpm validate 237/237.

#2846 gave 206 and 207 an all-chains default view and #2852 renamed them off
the solana- prefix, but the renaming stopped at the title. The body did not
move, so both pages shipped to production saying "leads Solana terminals",
"routed Solana volume divided by that day's swap count", and, in every one of
the eighteen provider formulas, "on Solana on the day".

That is a page contradicting its own tab strip in front of readers, on the
figure it exists to publish. Fixed across the seo_description, disclaimer,
seo_intro, methodology, findings, FAQ and all eighteen formulas.

207's "Is this Solana only?" FAQ was the wrong question once the answer became
no; it now answers how to read one chain at a time, which is what someone
looking at eight tabs actually wants to know.

Three mentions of Solana stay in each, and all three are true: the methodology
line about BasedBot routing on Robinhood and almost nothing on Solana, and the
tags on Trojan and Photon, which really are Solana-only products.
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier merged commit df56c7d into dev Oct 7, 2026
2 checks passed
@Flotapponnier
Flotapponnier deleted the fix/chain-aware-copy branch October 7, 2026 15:39
Flotapponnier added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2026
…2854) (#2855)

#2846 gave 206 and 207 an all-chains default view and #2852 renamed them off
the solana- prefix, but the renaming stopped at the title. The body did not
move, so both pages shipped to production saying "leads Solana terminals",
"routed Solana volume divided by that day's swap count", and, in every one of
the eighteen provider formulas, "on Solana on the day".

That is a page contradicting its own tab strip in front of readers, on the
figure it exists to publish. Fixed across the seo_description, disclaimer,
seo_intro, methodology, findings, FAQ and all eighteen formulas.

207's "Is this Solana only?" FAQ was the wrong question once the answer became
no; it now answers how to read one chain at a time, which is what someone
looking at eight tabs actually wants to know.

Three mentions of Solana stay in each, and all three are true: the methodology
line about BasedBot routing on Robinhood and almost nothing on Solana, and the
tags on Trojan and Photon, which really are Solana-only products.

(cherry picked from commit df56c7d)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant