[BUG] dmic recording volume is too low

Describe the bug
The dmic volume is too low even the max volume of input/output is set.

To Reproduce
Set the max volume in gnome-setting.
$ arecord -f cd b.wav

Reproduction Rate
100%

Expected behavior
Clear audio recording.

Impact
It's barely to hear the dmic.

Environment
1)
* Kernel: 6.12 9f16d5e6f2206 (linux/master) Merge tag 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm
* SOF: db771bf v2.11.x: add new 2.11.2 topology2 production binaries

Name of the topology file
- Topology: intel/sof-ipc4-tplg/sof-lnl-rt713-l0-rt1318-l1-2ch.tplg
Name of the platform(s) on which the bug is observed.
- Platform: ThinkPad X1G13 Intel CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 258V

Screenshots or console output
x1g13-mic-low-dmesg.txt

@pma1

@pma1 its worth opening up alsamixer here and trying to adjust the gains as this gain may not be mapped into the sound control panel.
@bardliao any comments ?

screenshot of alsamixer, the caputure volume is max.

@pma1

This is PCH DMIC. @pma1 Can you share the result of amixer -c0 contents?
And try amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture Volume' 45

$ amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture Volume' 45
numid=40,iface=MIXER,name='Dmic0 Capture Volume'
; type=INTEGER,access=rw---R--,values=2,min=0,max=45,step=0
: values=45,45
| dBscale-min=-90.00dB,step=2.00dB,mute=1

After set command above, the volume is still the same low as before.

output of amixer -c0 contents:
amixer-contents.txt

@pma1

@pma1 The mixer setting looks good to me. Can you share the captured wav file? Can you try different formats? Like -fS16_LE -c2 -r48000, -fS24_LE -c2 -r48000, -fS32_LE -c2 -r48000. @singalsu Could it be an DMIC0 Capture IIR Eq issue?

arecord-16-24-32.tar.gz

arecord file attached, thanks.

@pma1

@pma1 Can you try arecord -Dhw:0,10 -fS32_LE -r48000 -c2 file.wav?

The volume is as low as before.

We are in progress of adding DRC and other capture pre-processing. I'll do a pull request to enable it on this topology. It will boost the capture level.

@pma1

@pma1 Are you able to replace the topology (keep a backup if this fails) with this from my test build? Please unzip it since GH does not allow .tplg attachment. If the installed topology is with different file name with compression, move it so there's no lottery for which topology gets loaded.

sof-lnl-rt713-l0-rt1318-l1-2ch.zip

Then you need to find the control for DRC from "alsamixer -c0" and enable it with key m. You can also enable the TDFB beam for beamformer and set the beam angle to 0 degrees with cursor up/down keys. There's only single angle in the blob so there won't be a steerable beam but future topologies may have it, so it doesn't hurt to set it too.

Once the controls are set, they should persists if you keep using same topology. You can also set the controls from command line, e.g.

amixer -c0 controls | grep Dmic0
amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture DRC switch' on
amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture TDFB beam switch' on
amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture TDFB angle set enum' 0
amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture Volume' 100%

@pma1

@pma1 @bardliao It is possible to get even more gain with custom DRC and IIR blobs but I'd not do it with generic topologies but instead with UCM2 runtime rules with matched DMI ID. We have already a framework to control SOF for playback with sof-hda-generic (see https://github.com/alsa-project/alsa-ucm-conf/tree/master/ucm2/blobs/sof) and such should be added capture also and other PC platforms with SDW codec.

@singalsu

@singalsu
Thanks for your kindly help.

The tplg you uploaded is failed to be loaded, please refer to the dmesg:
6.12-x1cg13-sof-load-fail-dmesg.txt

@singalsu

@singalsu @ujfalusi see

[    3.937788] sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: Parent card not yet available, widget card binding deferred
[    3.937812] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: Direct firmware load for intel/sof-ipc4-lib/lnl/B36EE4DA-006F-47F9-A06D-FECBE2D8B6CE.bin failed with error -2
[    3.937814] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: Library file 'intel/sof-ipc4-lib/lnl/B36EE4DA-006F-47F9-A06D-FECBE2D8B6CE.bin' is missing
[    3.937815] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: failed to find module info for widget drc.100.1 with UUID B36EE4DA-006F-47F9-A06D-FECBE2D8B6CE
[    3.937816] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: failed updating IPC struct for drc.100.1
[    3.937915] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: error: tplg component load failed -22
[    3.937917] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: error: failed to load DSP topology -22
[    3.937918] sof-audio-pci-intel-lnl 0000:00:1f.3: ASoC: error at snd_soc_component_probe on 0000:00:1f.3: -22

@pma1 can you ls -l the contents of 'intel/sof-ipc4-lib/lnl/ in the firmware directory. Thanks.

@lgirdwood

@lgirdwood

After copied the intel/sof-ipc4-lib/lnl/ file,

The sound card works, the mic volume it better, but not loud enough.
x1cg13-mic-arecod-better-f-cd.tar.gz

but it keep the same volume even set "amixer -c0 cset name='Dmic0 Capture TDFB angle set enum' 90"

Set 'Dmic0 Capture TDFB angle set enum' to -90, the vomlume is the same.

dmesg:
6.12-x1cg13-sof-mic-volume-better.txt

Thanks for testing it! I noticed there's in similar hda-generic topology gain applied in IIR, so it is still louder than this. I'll do another change to change IIR to amplifying type.

The beam angle should be 0 towards user, that's how to coordinates were defined. But there is no 90 degree beam in the blob, so there is no impact except for beam on/off. Blobs with better control are possible with DMI ID based load by UCM.

Can you please try this topology:
sof-lnl-rt713-l0-rt1318-l1-2ch-plus20db.zip

It's very good that you are able to test since I don't have access to a similar PC. Can you try to talk very loud to the microphone when capturing, like people might do in a loud environment like cafe with babble. Does the microphone signal clip or sound distorted?

@singalsu

@singalsu

Thank you.

The mic volume is much better, no distorted sound found.

I think this tplg is good.

@pma1

Thanks @pma1 ! I'll proceed with this latest change in this pull request: #9690

The next SOF release should be OK.

Thanks to all of you for the great help.

@pma1

@pma1 Can you please check this smaller fix that would be quick to release as stable-v2.11 update. This change only adds gain to IIR, there's no added DRC and TDFB components. What do you think, does this sufficiently address the issue?

sof-lnl-rt713-l0-rt1318-l1-2ch-iir-only-plus20db.zip

@singalsu

@singalsu there is no obviously difference with previous tplg, maybe minor lower volume but hardly noticed.

I think this can fix the issue.

@pma1

Thanks a lot for testing @pma1 ! @kv2019i @lgirdwood I think then we can proceed with #9698 fix for 2.11.

@pma1

Thanks a lot for testing @pma1 ! @kv2019i @lgirdwood I think then we can proceed with #9698 fix for 2.11.

Will merge this as soon as CI is back later today.

Fix merged, closing. Will be released in sof-bin-2024.09.2 binary release.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

[BUG] dmic recording volume is too low #9681

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

[BUG] dmic recording volume is too low #9681

Description

Activity

lgirdwood commented on Nov 26, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 27, 2024

bardliao commented on Nov 27, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 27, 2024

bardliao commented on Nov 27, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 27, 2024

bardliao commented on Nov 27, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 27, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 28, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 28, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 28, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 28, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 28, 2024

lgirdwood commented on Nov 28, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 29, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 29, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 29, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 29, 2024

singalsu commented on Nov 29, 2024

pma1 commented on Nov 29, 2024

singalsu commented on Dec 2, 2024

pma1 commented on Dec 2, 2024

singalsu commented on Dec 2, 2024

lgirdwood commented on Dec 2, 2024

kv2019i commented on Dec 5, 2024

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions