Skip to content

Re-introducing state change in dai_comp_trigger_internal() breaks some tests from Intel CI #8920

Closed as not planned

Description

@LaurentiuM1234

Attempting to bring back the state transition logic in dai-zephyr's dai_comp_trigger_internal() that was initially removed by 6ffb052 seems to break some tests from the Intel CI. The logic is needed for NXP platforms and is re-introduced by #8859 via 59d05a3.

As a workaround, the state transition logic has been made IPC3-specific but it might be worth looking into this and trying to make the code IPC version-agnostic if possible.

Links to the aforementioned failing CI builds:

Activity

  1. added this to the v2.10 milestone on Mar 8, 2024
  2. lgirdwood commented on Mar 8, 2024

    @lgirdwood
    Member

    @LaurentiuM1234 probably the best thing todo is to break down the changes into small bi-sectable patches and upstream them incrementally. This would allow more specific targeting when the issue is introduced.

  3. lgirdwood commented on May 28, 2024

    @lgirdwood
    Member

    @LaurentiuM1234 are we good to close now that #8859 is merged or more still todo ?

  4. LaurentiuM1234 commented on May 28, 2024

    @LaurentiuM1234
    ContributorAuthor

    @LaurentiuM1234 are we good to close now that #8859 is merged or more still todo ?

    This issue was actually created by the introduction of #8859 (1bf6b8c). I think the question still stands: why does that code bit break Intel test(s) if made IPC version-agnostic?

  5. kv2019i commented on Jun 5, 2024

    @kv2019i
    Collaborator

    Stable branched for 2.10, nobody assigned to work on this, so moving this to 2.11.

  6. modified the milestones: v2.10, v2.11 on Jun 5, 2024
  7. kv2019i commented on Sep 5, 2024

    @kv2019i
    Collaborator

    No owner -> v2.12

  8. modified the milestones: v2.11, v2.12 on Sep 5, 2024
  9. kv2019i commented on Jan 3, 2025

    @kv2019i
    Collaborator

    No owner still -> v2.13

  10. modified the milestones: v2.12, v2.13 on Jan 3, 2025
  11. kv2019i commented on Apr 23, 2025

    @kv2019i
    Collaborator

    No owner for two releases, moving to TBD milestone for now.

  12. modified the milestones: v2.13, TBD on Apr 23, 2025
  13. github-actions commented on Jul 24, 2025

    @github-actions

    This issue has been marked as stale because it has been open (more than) 60 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment saying that you would like to have the label removed otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 14 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.

  14. added
    staleIssue/PR marked as stale and will be closed after 14 days if there is no activity.
    on Jul 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    staleIssue/PR marked as stale and will be closed after 14 days if there is no activity.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions