You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[BUG] alsabat test failed with 821Hz on IPC4 nocodec platforms #7285
Describe the bug
This issue only happened on IPC4 nocodec platform with 821Hz sine wav. From the waveform, there's a glitch and it seems that one sample point is inverted. No such issue with 599 or 997 Hz
changed the title [-][BUG] alsabat test failed on IPC4 nocodec platforms[/-][+][BUG] alsabat test failed with 821Hz on IPC4 nocodec platforms[/+]on Mar 16, 2023
@singalsu how can we make the CI testing more clever to reject glitches on the USB testing HW ?
I'm making a proposal for additional glitch detector with Octave to check the alsabat recording, since alsabat may miss some issues. The test is for measuring presence of a test frequency, not really to find poor audio or glitches. But it will also support ignore of start ramp that can now trigger alsabat. If it works we can relax a bit alsabat and rely more on the additional test.
Activity
[-][BUG] alsabat test failed on IPC4 nocodec platforms[/-][+][BUG] alsabat test failed with 821Hz on IPC4 nocodec platforms[/+]keqiaozhang commentedon Mar 16, 2023
We have a duplicate, internal issue 379
lgirdwood commentedon Mar 17, 2023
The sine frequency should make no difference to the result, is the glitch periodic or just random in position/channel ?
keqiaozhang commentedon Mar 20, 2023
Just random in position/channel, no rules.
lgirdwood commentedon Mar 21, 2023
@singalsu how can we make the CI testing more clever to reject glitches on the USB testing HW ?
singalsu commentedon Mar 23, 2023
I'm making a proposal for additional glitch detector with Octave to check the alsabat recording, since alsabat may miss some issues. The test is for measuring presence of a test frequency, not really to find poor audio or glitches. But it will also support ignore of start ramp that can now trigger alsabat. If it works we can relax a bit alsabat and rely more on the additional test.
lrudyX commentedon Mar 24, 2023
@keqiaozhang we need IPC logs with payloads to reproduce with FW tests, could you prepare?
juimonen commentedon Mar 28, 2023
anyone able to replicate this locally? I just can't reproduce in my upx...
keqiaozhang commentedon Mar 29, 2023
I did a quick check on TGL-UP and ADLP-RVP nocodec devices, it seems that this issue no longer exists on these 2 platforms.
lgirdwood commentedon Mar 29, 2023
ok, pls close when happy its not in daily test.
keqiaozhang commentedon Mar 30, 2023
This issue no longer exists in CI, closing this bug.