You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[BUG] dai_config IPC timeout on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC when arecord #4164
changed the title [-][BUG] soc_pcm_hw_params and dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params failed on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC when arecord[/-][+][BUG] dai_config IPC timeout on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC when arecord[/+]on May 11, 2021
Activity
[-][BUG] soc_pcm_hw_params and dpcm_fe_dai_hw_params failed on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC when arecord[/-][+][BUG] dai_config IPC timeout on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC when arecord[/+]slawblauciak commentedon May 11, 2021
Can you please check if #4089 is effective against this issue? Thanks
XiaoyunWu6666 commentedon May 11, 2021
This issue happens on ADLP_RVP_NOCODEC in May10's daily,plz refer to
http://sof-ci.sh.intel.com/#/result/planresultdetail/3868?model=ADLP_RVP_NOCODEC&testcase=check-capture-3rounds
will check whether #4089 works ASAP
keyonjie commentedon May 12, 2021
looks this is a driver regression, it pass on May 9th daily but failed on May 10th.
XiaoyunWu6666 commentedon May 12, 2021
#4089 is effective against this issue. [tested on ubuntu@sh-tglu-rvp-nocodec-02]
It can fix 3 cases that failed on TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC on May 9th.
lgirdwood commentedon May 12, 2021
IPC timeouts are FW crashes.
XiaoyunWu6666 commentedon May 13, 2021
appear on ADLP_RVP_NOCODEC too
http://sof-ci.sh.intel.com/#/result/planresultdetail/3910?model=ADLP_RVP_NOCODEC&testcase=multiple-pipeline-capture
XiaoyunWu6666 commentedon May 13, 2021
appear on TGLH_0A5E_SDW too
http://sof-ci.sh.intel.com/#/result/planresultdetail/3910?model=TGLH_0A5E_SDW&testcase=multiple-pipeline-capture-50
appear on TGLU_SKU0A32_SDCA too
https://sof-ci.sh.intel.com/#/result/planresultdetail/3937?model=TGLU_SKU0A32_SDCA&testcase=multiple-pipeline-playback-50
keyonjie commentedon May 13, 2021
Yes, maybe FW change on 10th lead to this?
Anyway, the PR #4089 will fix it.
lgirdwood commentedon May 20, 2021
@XiaoyunWu6666 is this now fixed with recent kernel updates and on stable-v1.8 branch ?
XiaoyunWu6666 commentedon May 21, 2021
Yes , it is