You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[Feature] Better UCM support for SOF in upstream #956
I'd like to find a way to reuse the legacy UCM files and just substitute the SST parts with the SOF info. it's not scalable if we have to maintain stuff twice. this means finding a way to detect that when the card begins with sof- it may still use existing components.
@juimonen@mengdonglin@libinyang I would propose to close this feature ticket. I believe we have closed all the improvement items listed in this original items. We have two specific items left and I today filed separate items to track those: #2068 and #2067
Activity
plbossart commentedon May 17, 2019
I'd like to find a way to reuse the legacy UCM files and just substitute the SST parts with the SOF info. it's not scalable if we have to maintain stuff twice. this means finding a way to detect that when the card begins with sof- it may still use existing components.
[-][Featrure] Better UCM support for SOF in upstream[/-][+][Feature] Better UCM support for SOF in upstream[/+]RanderWang commentedon May 23, 2019
this is my suggestion and Pierre gave some advice
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-May/149409.html
mengdonglin commentedon Jun 14, 2019
@RanderWang @juimonen @wenqingfu
Please also read the latest discussion between Pierre and Jaroslav:
[alsa-devel] SOF firmware/ucm/topology packaging
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2019-May/149961.html
kv2019i commentedon Apr 29, 2020
@juimonen @mengdonglin @libinyang I would propose to close this feature ticket. I believe we have closed all the improvement items listed in this original items. We have two specific items left and I today filed separate items to track those: #2068 and #2067
mengdonglin commentedon May 13, 2020
@kv2019i Closed and thanks for identifying current gap!
vfs: Fix potential circular locking through setxattr() and removexattr()