You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
/// A page management error.enumError{/// No clusters left in the freelist.////// This is the equivalent to OOM, but with disk space.OutOfClusters{
description("Out of free clusters.")}/// A page checksum did not match.////// The checksum of the data and the checksum stored in the page pointer did not match.////// This indicates some form of data corruption in the sector storing the page.PageChecksumMismatch{/// The page with the mismatching checksum.page: page::Pointer,/// The actual checksum of the page.found: u32,}{display("Mismatching checksums in {} - expected {:x}, found {:x}.",
page, page.checksum, found)description("Mismatching checksum in page.")}}
gives error
error: expected ident, found #
--> /home/andy/code/tfs/src/io/alloc.rs:22:13
|
22 | /// The page with the mismatching checksum.
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I've tried to implement it here, but the code is really messy, and I am having a hard time following it, so it ends up in an error currently, however I suspect it is almost in goal.
I think implementation should be similar to #30, except we don't need these attributes in match statements. Your one looks fine, but I haven't tested it yet.
By the way, this feature and #30 may conflict somehow (both work on attributes on variants but the attributes should be propagated in different ways). This is also the reason why I haven't applied #30. Hadn't checked if the conflict is real, though.
Activity
ticki commentedon Jan 25, 2017
The issue seems to be that it doesn't respond to metadata attributes on fields, which has the consequence that
#[doc = "blah"]doesn't work.ticki commentedon Jan 25, 2017
I've tried to implement it here, but the code is really messy, and I am having a hard time following it, so it ends up in an error currently, however I suspect it is almost in goal.
tailhook commentedon Jan 25, 2017
I think implementation should be similar to #30, except we don't need these attributes in
matchstatements. Your one looks fine, but I haven't tested it yet.By the way, this feature and #30 may conflict somehow (both work on attributes on variants but the attributes should be propagated in different ways). This is also the reason why I haven't applied #30. Hadn't checked if the conflict is real, though.
ticki commentedon Jan 25, 2017
I like #30.
ticki commentedon Jan 25, 2017
Oh. It's not a replacement, but a related pr. nvm
tailhook commentedon Apr 24, 2017
Okay, I've merged in #30, but can't easily figure out how to fix this one :(