[mattberther]

No description provided.

[titpetric]

Hi. Due to recent changes, this PR has been outdated. Could you rebase/re-implement the checkers against the structure in the master branch? I'd like to have this in, if you're willing to update this.

[mattberther]

@titpetric Rebase complete. Please review and let me know if you have any changes.

[titpetric]

LGTM: ♥️ update appreciated!

@beyang PTAL, let me know if you need a CLA for this. Not sure how strict you need to be with it.

[beyang]

Seeing if we can streamline this a bit: #129

[beyang]

@mattberther can you post a message acknowledging the DCO applies to this PR (as the DCO file did not exist at the time you opened the PR)? That way, we can merge this without asking to sign the CLA.

[mattberther]

@beyang the DCO applies to this PR

[titpetric]

Thank you for your contribution!

[titpetric]

Hey @mattberther - just a heads up, I'll be updating the definition for to to take an array of recipients. It will land shortly, just letting you know to avoid possible breaks on your side.