Skip to content

Add a type checker #114

Closed
Closed

Description

@hugovk

Might also be worth adding a type checker, which could have caught #107.

Originally posted by @JelleZijlstra in #109 (comment)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions