Skip to content

Status of Sphinx #192

Description

@kaycebasques

Hi, a few of us heavy Sphinx users are worried about the lack of activity over the last 5 months. @jdillard did some archaeology and saw that Adam (not pinging here out of courtesy in case they've got bigger stuff to worry about) has joined your meetings in the past. Just doing my part to get the discussions rolling and ensure that the project remains active and healthy. https://github.com/orgs/sphinx-doc/discussions/14432

Activity

  1. nedbat commented on May 20, 2026

    @nedbat
    Member

    We might need to get into contact with people who have been active. @AA-Turner is one of them, and may have some insights to share.

  2. AA-Turner commented on May 20, 2026

    @AA-Turner
    Member

    Thanks for the ping! If you want to get in contact directly, feel free to email my first name at python dot org.

    I haven't had as much time recently due to various real-life circumstances, but fear not that previous Sphinx releases continue to work, and I'm not dead (yet!).

    A

  3. reopened this on May 20, 2026
  4. nedbat commented on May 20, 2026

    @nedbat
    Member

    Adam, I appreciate you are busy, but let's not close this yet. A private email exchange with you doesn't seem like a good way to alleviate the community's concerns. We can try to find other Sphinx people, it certainly doesn't have to be all on your shoulders.

  5. jdillard commented on May 21, 2026

    @jdillard

    My concerns are taken care of. I wasn't too worried about things picking back up, but it was nice to have some light shown on the situation. Thanks to everyone involved!

  6. kaycebasques commented on May 21, 2026

    @kaycebasques
    Author

    Written confirmation of project status helps me a lot, thanks. As mentioned elsewhere, we depend heavily on Sphinx and it wouldn't be hard for me to get manager buy-in to help out in upstream Sphinx more. Will start triaging issues per Adam's request but happy to do more. There are quite a few Google projects depending on Sphinx so I may also be able to rally support from other teams, too.

  7. nedbat commented on May 21, 2026

    @nedbat
    Member

    I have to admit to being a bit confused. The only information we've gotten is that triaging is appreciated and "previous releases continue to work." Are there enough people working on Sphinx to get issues resolved and new versions shipped?

  8. StanFromIreland commented on May 21, 2026

    @StanFromIreland
    Member

    Also note that the Python docs are stuck at Sphinx 8.2.3, the newer releases broke some translations so we had to revert.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions