Skip to content

python -m venv --copies attempts to create a symlink regardless of if it's supported by the filesystem #98975

Description

@stiege

Bug report

https://bugs.python.org/issue21197 added a lib64 symlink for compatibility on POSIX systems. venv's behaviour differs from virtualenvs in that virtualenv does a check to see if the filesystem is able to symlink (https://github.com/pypa/virtualenv/blob/b85542c31ca8afcff317e618da434f59fa06d122/src/virtualenv/info.py#L28-L47)

https://bugs.python.org/msg219258

If the filesystem does not support symlinks (i.e. FAT) the exception is unhandled and the process exits - leaving the virtual environment structure unfinished. The issue can be worked around by creating a directory in the symlink's location before invoking venv (

if not os.path.exists(link_path): # Issue #21643
).

Ideally venv would do a similar check to virtualenv or silently ignore the exception as this is just for POSIX compatibility purposes anyway (and the edge-case is already ignored of the directory existing).

Your environment

root@650ae388ee44:~# python --version
Python 3.10.4
root@650ae388ee44:~# python -m venv venv --copies  # Throws an exception on FAT fs, venv unfinished
root@650ae388ee44:~# find venv/ -type l  # gah, a symlink
venv/lib64
root@650ae388ee44:~# rm -rf venv/
root@650ae388ee44:~# mkdir -p venv/lib64  # Workaround
root@650ae388ee44:~# python -m venv venv --copies
root@650ae388ee44:~# find venv/ -type l
root@650ae388ee44:~#

Activity

  1. added
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    on Nov 1, 2022
  2. akulakov commented on Dec 15, 2022

    @akulakov
    Contributor

    It seems like --copies shouldn't create symlinks anyway; can you provide the traceback? I don't have a windows system but i can look into this. Do you also get the same error with --symlinks ?

    [Edit: after posting I think I realized what you meant -- --copies does copy for some files but not for lib64. Should it also copy lib64?]

  3. brettcannon commented on Mar 5, 2023

    @brettcannon
    Member

    It shouldn't copy lib64 because it symlinks to lib, so you're effectively copying site-packages which doesn't make sense since you now have two different places to potentially install which won't work.

    I think the real question is whether when people say --copies on Unix are they saying they don't want any symlinks or simply to not even attempt because I expect symlinking to fail? If it's the former then symlinking should be skipped, but if it's the latter then for compatibility the exception for failure should just be caught and ignored.

  4. added
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    topic-venvRelated to the venv module
    on Nov 26, 2023
  5. gaborbernat commented on Jun 5, 2026

    @gaborbernat
    Contributor

    The lib64 -> lib symlink that fails here was removed from venv entirely in 3.15 (gh-133951, #137139, commit a7a485558c0), so venv no longer creates that symlink and the unguarded failure on filesystems without symlink support (FAT, CIFS) can't occur — a venv on main now has only lib. That matches the point above that symlinking/copying lib64 doesn't make sense.

    Recommend closing as resolved (fixed by gh-133951).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytopic-venvRelated to the venv moduletype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions