Skip to content

Document the removal the usage of the C stack in Python to Python calls #89480

Closed

Description

@markshannon
BPO 45317
Nosy @markshannon, @pablogsal
PRs
  • GH-89480: Document motivation, design and implementation of 3.11 frame stack. #32304
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = 'https://github.com/pablogsal'
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2021-09-29.11:40:33.214>
    labels = ['3.11', 'type-feature', 'deferred-blocker', 'docs']
    title = 'Document the removal the usage of the C stack in Python to Python calls'
    updated_at = <Date 2022-04-04.14:10:02.227>
    user = 'https://github.com/markshannon'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2022-04-04.14:10:02.227>
    actor = 'Mark.Shannon'
    assignee = 'pablogsal'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Documentation']
    creation = <Date 2021-09-29.11:40:33.214>
    creator = 'Mark.Shannon'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 45317
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 3.0
    messages = ['402850', '402853', '414655']
    nosy_count = 3.0
    nosy_names = ['docs@python', 'Mark.Shannon', 'pablogsal']
    pr_nums = ['32304']
    priority = 'deferred blocker'
    resolution = None
    stage = 'patch review'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = None
    type = 'enhancement'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue45317'
    versions = ['Python 3.11']

    Linked PRs

    Activity

    1. markshannon commented on Sep 29, 2021

      @markshannon
      MemberAuthor

      Assuming that bpo-45256 is implemented, we will need to document it.

      I'm opening a separate issue, so this doesn't get lost in the midst of 45256.

      We need to:

      Document the changes to gdb. Possibly at https://wiki.python.org/moin/DebuggingWithGdb, or in the main docs.

      Add a "what's new" entry explaining what the impact of this change is.

    2. 23 remaining items

    3. encukou commented on Feb 14, 2024

      @encukou
      Member

      @pablogsal, if you share the draft, in whatever state it is, I can finish it.

    4. pablogsal commented on Feb 14, 2024

      @pablogsal
      Member

      @pablogsal, if you share the draft, in whatever state it is, I can finish it.

      Will try to share it today after the SC meeting

    5. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 19, 2024
    6. pablogsal commented on Feb 19, 2024

      @pablogsal
      Member

      @encukou Opened a PR here with what I had: #115657

      Please, feel free to modify it

    7. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 23, 2024
    8. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Feb 23, 2024
    9. added 2 commits that reference this issue on Feb 23, 2024
    10. encukou commented on Feb 23, 2024

      @encukou
      Member

      Thanks!

    11. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 4, 2024
    12. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 17, 2024
    13. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 22, 2025
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    Labels

    3.11only security fixesdeferred-blockerdocsDocumentation in the Doc dirtype-featureA feature request or enhancement

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions