Skip to content

3.13 CI uses 3.12 for generation scripts #142457

Description

@ZeroIntensity

In #142248, I noticed that my script did not work in 3.13's CI, because it used Python 3.12 instead of 3.13 or later.

The problem is in 3.13's configure script. As noted by @hugovk, 3.13's configure only checks for Python 3.13 and below, so the Python 3.14 installation used by actions/setup-python is thrown away, and an old Python 3.12.3 copy that comes with the image is used instead.

This is quite unfortunate, because for CI tools, we have to either limit ourselves to 3.12 features or create slightly different scripts for each branch (which is not ideal for backporting). In my case, I used _colorize in the job that I added, but I would have to remove that usage on the 3.13 branch, which would make it very frustrating to edit the script without conflicts.

I see two good solutions:

  1. Force the actions/setup-python job to install Python 3.13 instead of 3.14.
  2. Add 3.14 to the configure script.

My personal preference is the latter.

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. added
    3.13only security fixes
    infraCI, GitHub Actions, buildbots, Dependabot, etc.
    on Dec 9, 2025
  2. Locked-chess-official commented on Dec 10, 2025

    @Locked-chess-official
    Contributor

    Use sys.version_info to control whether to import "_colorize":

    Details
    import re
    from pathlib import Path
    import sys
    
    _MAJOR, _MINOR = sys.version_info[:2]
    if _MAJOR >= 3 and _MINOR >= 13:
        import _colorize
    
    import textwrap
    
    SIMPLE_FUNCTION_REGEX = re.compile(r"PyAPI_FUNC(.+) (\w+)\(")
    SIMPLE_MACRO_REGEX = re.compile(r"# *define *(\w+)(\(.+\))? ")
    SIMPLE_INLINE_REGEX = re.compile(r"static inline .+( |\n)(\w+)")
    SIMPLE_DATA_REGEX = re.compile(r"PyAPI_DATA\(.+\) (\w+)")
    
    CPYTHON = Path(__file__).parent.parent.parent
    INCLUDE = CPYTHON / "Include"
    C_API_DOCS = CPYTHON / "Doc" / "c-api"
    IGNORED = (
        (CPYTHON / "Tools" / "check-c-api-docs" / "ignored_c_api.txt")
        .read_text()
        .split("\n")
    )
    
    for index, line in enumerate(IGNORED):
        if line.startswith("#"):
            IGNORED.pop(index)
    
    MISTAKE = """
    If this is a mistake and this script should not be failing, create an
    issue and tag Peter (@ZeroIntensity) on it.\
    """
    
    
    def found_undocumented(singular: bool) -> str:
        some = "an" if singular else "some"
        s = "" if singular else "s"
        these = "this" if singular else "these"
        them = "it" if singular else "them"
        were = "was" if singular else "were"
    
        return (
            textwrap.dedent(
                f"""
        Found {some} undocumented C API{s}!
        Python requires documentation on all public C API symbols, macros, and types.
        If {these} API{s} {were} not meant to be public, prefix {them} with a
        leading underscore (_PySomething_API) or move {them} to the internal C API
        (pycore_*.h files).
        In exceptional cases, certain APIs can be ignored by adding them to
        Tools/check-c-api-docs/ignored_c_api.txt
        """
            )
            + MISTAKE
        )
    
    
    def found_ignored_documented(singular: bool) -> str:
        some = "a" if singular else "some"
        s = "" if singular else "s"
        them = "it" if singular else "them"
        were = "was" if singular else "were"
        they = "it" if singular else "they"
    
        return (
            textwrap.dedent(
                f"""
        Found {some} C API{s} listed in Tools/c-api-docs-check/ignored_c_api.txt, but
        {they} {were} found in the documentation. To fix this, remove {them} from
        ignored_c_api.txt.
        """
            )
            + MISTAKE
        )
    
    
    def is_documented(name: str) -> bool:
        """
        Is a name present in the C API documentation?
        """
        for path in C_API_DOCS.iterdir():
            if path.is_dir():
                continue
            if path.suffix != ".rst":
                continue
    
            text = path.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
            if name in text:
                return True
    
        return False
    
    
    def scan_file_for_docs(filename: str, text: str) -> tuple[list[str], list[str]]:
        """
        Scan a header file for  C API functions.
        """
        undocumented: list[str] = []
        documented_ignored: list[str] = []
    
        if _MAJOR >= 3 and _MINOR >= 13:
            colors = _colorize.get_colors()
        else:
            class colors:
                RED = "\x1b[31m"
                BOLD_RED = "\x1b[1;31m"
                BOLD_YELLOW = "\x1b[1;33m"
                RESET = "\x1b[0m"
    
        def check_for_name(name: str) -> None:
            documented = is_documented(name)
            if documented and (name in IGNORED):
                documented_ignored.append(name)
            elif not documented and (name not in IGNORED):
                undocumented.append(name)
    
        for function in SIMPLE_FUNCTION_REGEX.finditer(text):
            name = function.group(2)
            if not name.startswith("Py"):
                continue
    
            check_for_name(name)
    
        for macro in SIMPLE_MACRO_REGEX.finditer(text):
            name = macro.group(1)
            if not name.startswith("Py"):
                continue
    
            if "(" in name:
                name = name[: name.index("(")]
    
            check_for_name(name)
    
        for inline in SIMPLE_INLINE_REGEX.finditer(text):
            name = inline.group(2)
            if not name.startswith("Py"):
                continue
    
            check_for_name(name)
    
        for data in SIMPLE_DATA_REGEX.finditer(text):
            name = data.group(1)
            if not name.startswith("Py"):
                continue
    
            check_for_name(name)
    
        # Remove duplicates and sort alphabetically to keep the output deterministic
        undocumented = list(set(undocumented))
        undocumented.sort()
    
        if undocumented or documented_ignored:
            print(f"{filename} {colors.RED}BAD{colors.RESET}")
            for name in undocumented:
                print(f"{colors.BOLD_RED}UNDOCUMENTED:{colors.RESET} {name}")
            for name in documented_ignored:
                print(f"{colors.BOLD_YELLOW}DOCUMENTED BUT IGNORED:{colors.RESET} {name}")
        else:
            print(f"{filename} {colors.GREEN}OK{colors.RESET}")
    
        return undocumented, documented_ignored
    
    
    def main() -> None:
        print("Scanning for undocumented C API functions...")
        files = [*INCLUDE.iterdir(), *(INCLUDE / "cpython").iterdir()]
        all_missing: list[str] = []
        all_found_ignored: list[str] = []
    
        for file in files:
            if file.is_dir():
                continue
            assert file.exists()
            text = file.read_text(encoding="utf-8")
            missing, ignored = scan_file_for_docs(str(file.relative_to(INCLUDE)), text)
            all_found_ignored += ignored
            all_missing += missing
    
        fail = False
        to_check = [
            (all_missing, "missing", found_undocumented(len(all_missing) == 1)),
            (
                all_found_ignored,
                "documented but ignored",
                found_ignored_documented(len(all_found_ignored) == 1),
            ),
        ]
        for name_list, what, message in to_check:
            if not name_list:
                continue
    
            s = "s" if len(name_list) != 1 else ""
            print(f"-- {len(name_list)} {what} C API{s} --")
            for name in name_list:
                print(f" - {name}")
            print(message)
            fail = True
    
        sys.exit(1 if fail else 0)
    
    
    if __name__ == "__main__":
        main()
    
    

    The script only use a little of the module, so it is easy to realize a smallest implement.

  3. ZeroIntensity commented on Dec 10, 2025

    @ZeroIntensity
    MemberAuthor

    Yeah, that's a band-aid solution, but more fundamentally, we should be able to use modern features in our CI. I would rather not clutter the code with extra branches for what is really a problem with our GHA.

  4. added a commit that references this issue on Dec 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    3.13only security fixesinfraCI, GitHub Actions, buildbots, Dependabot, etc.

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions