Repository navigation
asyncio eager tasks' names are set too late #128308
Description
Bug report
Bug description:
consider:
import asyncio
async def main():
names = []
async with asyncio.TaskGroup() as tg:
async def append_name():
names.append(asyncio.current_task().get_name())
tg.create_task(append_name(), name="example name")
print(names)
def loop_factory():
loop = asyncio.EventLoop()
loop.set_task_factory(asyncio.eager_task_factory)
return loop
asyncio.run(main())
asyncio.run(main(), loop_factory=loop_factory)this outputs:
['example name']
['Task-5']
but it should output:
['example name']
['example name']
CPython versions tested on:
3.13
Operating systems tested on:
Linux
Linked PRs
- gh-128308: pass **kwargs to asyncio task_factory #128768
- [3.13] gh-128308: pass
**kwargsto asyncio task_factory (GH-128768) #130084 - [3.13] gh-128308: Revert "pass
**kwargsto asyncio task_factory (GH-128768) (#130084)" #133808 - [3.13] gh-133745: Fix asyncio task factory name/context kwarg breaks #133948
Activity
kumaraditya303 commentedon Jan 8, 2025
The task name should be passed when calling the task factory itself otherwise the first eager execution misses the set name.
graingert commentedon Jan 8, 2025
We should probably just pass the **kwargs without inspection
kumaraditya303 commentedon Jan 9, 2025
Feel free to propose an PR.
pythongh-128308: pass **kwargs to asyncio task_factory
pythongh-128308: pass **kwargs to asyncio task_factory
graingert commentedon Jan 15, 2025
@kumaraditya303 I've proposed a PR
gh-128308: pass `**kwargs` to asyncio task_factory (#128768)
pythongh-128308: pass `**kwargs` to asyncio task_factory (python#128768)
[3.13] pythongh-128308: pass `**kwargs` to asyncio task_factory (pyth…
[3.13] gh-128308: pass `**kwargs` to asyncio task_factory (GH-128768) (…
Revert "[3.13] pythongh-128308: pass `**kwargs` to asyncio task_facto…