Skip to content

datetime.strptime accepts incompatible arguments #124549

Description

@pganssle

Bug report

Bug description:

If you over-specify a datetime strptime string, it seems that datetime.strptime when encountering a component that has been specified twice, will overwrite earlier values with more recent ones.

>>> datetime.strptime("200099", "%Y%y")
datetime.datetime(1999, 1, 1, 0, 0)

One approach would be to ban over-specified formats, but that would be a problem for someone who wants to, use a format like "%M %B" (e.g. something sortable by month number while also showing month name), so I think we don't want to do that.

Alternatively we could start raising an exception if you get different values from these two things, or possibly a warning.

Or we can just accept that if you use a weird format you should expect weird behavior.

CPython versions tested on:

CPython main branch

Operating systems tested on:

Linux

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. Mariatta commented on Sep 26, 2024

    @Mariatta
    Member

    I'd be ok with raising exception, seems like it's a user error for passing these kind of conflicting format specifiers.

    We could also start documenting this case, saying that the latest format specifiers that appears will prevail.

  2. Mariatta commented on Oct 5, 2024

    @Mariatta
    Member

    @pganssle I created a PR to document this weird behavior. I think it's still worth raising a warning though. #125009

  3. alliesw commented on Dec 17, 2024

    @alliesw

    To avoid the issue where the last directive overwrites earlier values:
    since more than one directive is needed, maybe split the string and parse the components manually (handling the split and parsing based on the length of the string)?
    Maybe also apply custom logic to handle dynamic formats, especially if you encounter different scenarios with varying date formats.... (idk if your format is dynamic?)

  4. alliesw commented on Dec 17, 2024

    @alliesw

    This is an example of what I'm getting at:

    def parse_date(input_str):
        if len(input_str) == 6:  # 4-digit year followed by 2-digit year
            full_year = input_str[:4]
            short_year = input_str[4:]
            year_full = datetime.strptime(full_year, "%Y")
            year_short = datetime.strptime(short_year, "%y")
            return year_short.replace(year=year_full.year)  # Use full year from the first part
        elif len(input_str) == 4:  # Only 4-digit year
            return datetime.strptime(input_str, "%Y")
        else:
            raise ValueError("Invalid date format")

    Example usage:

    input_str = "200099"
    parsed_date = parse_date(input_str)
    print(parsed_date)  # datetime.datetime(1999, 1, 1, 0, 0)
  5. added
    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
    on Dec 17, 2024
  6. StanFromIreland commented on Apr 14, 2025

    @StanFromIreland
    Member

    This is a stdlib issue (strptime.py) the extension-modules label can be removed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions