Skip to content

critical section should avoid parking lot when re-entering top-most held critical section #114203

Closed

Description

@DinoV

Feature or enhancement

Proposal:

--disable-gil builds use critical sections more and more. In some cases a critcal section is held and will be re-entered immediately by the calling thread and this can be hard to avoid (e.g when we're going from C code to Python code back into related C code). Some examples of this are flushing I/O and calculating the MRO on a metaclass.

When this happens we treat this as re-entrancy to the critical section, and send it off to the parking lot to be released and then re-acquired. This can greatly slow down something which should just simply re-acquire the lock.

It's not super straight forward as we still need to support detaching and resuming the critical section in other cases of contention correctly for the lock.

As part of this it'd be good to also have the ability to collect stats on how often this is happening as we do want to generally avoid it and prefer lock-free paths where possible.

Has this already been discussed elsewhere?

No response given

Links to previous discussion of this feature:

No response

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. added a commit that references this issue on Dec 23, 2024
  2. Yhg1s commented on Dec 23, 2024

    @Yhg1s
    Member

    The optimisation is in, but without tracking or statistics on how often it happens. (The solution was more straight-forward than anticipated because we can simple skip entering the critical section altogether, leaving the original one in place.) Avoiding the recursion wasn't easily possible in the cases I looked at (e.g. a functools.lru_cache object wrapping methods, which means the cache is accessed per class), so I'm not sure tracking this specific situation is particularly useful, and would probably fall in the general "detect contention" bucket of problems.

    (Leaving this issue open for Dino to decide if we need to do more here.)

  3. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 8, 2025
  4. ofek commented on Oct 20, 2025

    @ofek
    SponsorContributor

    Hello! Did we decide on whether more work needs to be done here?

  5. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 14, 2025
  6. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 14, 2025
  7. kumaraditya303 commented on Nov 14, 2025

    @kumaraditya303
    Contributor

    Closing this as the optimization is now implemented for both one and two mutex critical sections.

  8. added a commit that references this issue on Nov 14, 2025
  9. added a commit that references this issue on Dec 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions