You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
test_cppext fails on s390x RHEL7 Refleaks 3.x: option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ (GCC 4.8.5) #107084
test test_cppext failed -- multiple errors occurred; run in verbose mode for details
(...)
gcc -std=gnu11 -pthread -fno-strict-overflow -Wsign-compare -g -Og -Wall -fPIC -I/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.refleak/build/build/test_python_34724æ/test_python_worker_42721æ/tempcwd/env/include -I/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.refleak/build/Include -I/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.refleak/build -c /home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.refleak/build/Lib/test/_testcppext.cpp -o build/temp.linux-s390x-cpython-313-pydebug/home/dje/cpython-buildarea/3.x.edelsohn-rhel-z.refleak/build/Lib/test/_testcppext.o -Werror -std=c++03
cc1plus: error: command line option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ [-Werror]
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
error: command '/usr/bin/gcc' failed with exit code 1
changed the title [-]test_cppext fails on s390x RHEL7 Refleaks 3.x: option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++[/-][+]test_cppext fails on s390x RHEL7 Refleaks 3.x: option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ (GCC 4.8.5)[/+]on Jul 22, 2023
Activity
vstinner commentedon Jul 22, 2023
test.pythoninfo:
[-]test_cppext fails on s390x RHEL7 Refleaks 3.x: option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++[/-][+]test_cppext fails on s390x RHEL7 Refleaks 3.x: option ‘-std=gnu11’ is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ (GCC 4.8.5)[/+]vstinner commentedon Jul 23, 2023
Maybe I can just skip the test on old GCC versions, like GCC 4.8.
@stratakis: Do we care about testing C++ support of Python 3.13 on RHEL7?
dtrodrigues commentedon Jul 23, 2023
This appears to be a dupe of #105776 introduced by #104925
vstinner commentedon Aug 16, 2023
Ok, I close this issue, let's continue in issue #105776.