Skip to content

Leaked semaphore objects in test_concurrent_futures #104090

Description

@furkanonder

Bug report

Configuration:

./configure --with-pydebug
$ ./python -m test test_concurrent_futures
0:00:00 load avg: 5.30 Run tests sequentially
0:00:00 load avg: 5.30 [1/1] test_concurrent_futures
/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py:66: DeprecationWarning: This process (pid=150426) is multi-threaded, use of fork() may lead to deadlocks in the child.
  self.pid = os.fork()
/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py:224: UserWarning: resource_tracker: There appear to be 6 leaked semaphore objects to clean up at shutdown
  warnings.warn('resource_tracker: There appear to be %d '
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 300, in _run_finalizers
    finalizer()
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/util.py", line 224, in __call__
    res = self._callback(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/workspace/cpython/Lib/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 87, in _cleanup
    sem_unlink(name)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
test_concurrent_futures passed in 2 min 17 sec

== Tests result: SUCCESS ==

1 test OK.

Total duration: 2 min 17 sec
Tests result: SUCCESS

Your environment

  • CPython versions tested on: CPython 3.12.0a7+
  • Operating system and architecture: Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS | Linux-5.15.0-47-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35 little-endian

Linked PRs

Activity

  1. sunmy2019 commented on May 3, 2023

    @sunmy2019
    Member

    The leakage is from FailingInitializerMixin. Don't know how to fix though.

  2. sobolevn commented on May 3, 2023

    @sobolevn
    Member

    Two failing tests:

    • test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolForkserverFailingInitializerTest.test_initializer
    • test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolSpawnFailingInitializerTest.test_initializer
  3. bityob commented on Jul 14, 2023

    @bityob
    Contributor
    1. Found out using git bisect that the first failed commit is 6883007, bpo-4080: unittest durations #12271
    2. I splited the commit to multiple new commits each per file, so I can use git bisect again to find the specific problematic file
    3. The file is unittest/result.py and this is the git diff
    diff --git a/Lib/unittest/result.py b/Lib/unittest/result.py
    index 5ca4c23238..fa9bea47c8 100644
    --- a/Lib/unittest/result.py
    +++ b/Lib/unittest/result.py
    @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ def __init__(self, stream=None, descriptions=None, verbosity=None):
           self.skipped = []
           self.expectedFailures = []
           self.unexpectedSuccesses = []
    +        self.collectedDurations = []
           self.shouldStop = False
           self.buffer = False
           self.tb_locals = False
    @@ -157,6 +158,12 @@ def addUnexpectedSuccess(self, test):
           """Called when a test was expected to fail, but succeed."""
           self.unexpectedSuccesses.append(test)
    
    +    def addDuration(self, test, elapsed):
    +        """Called when a test finished to run, regardless of its outcome."""
    +        # support for a TextTestRunner using an old TestResult class
    +        if hasattr(self, "collectedDurations"):
    +            self.collectedDurations.append((test, elapsed))
    +
       def wasSuccessful(self):
           """Tells whether or not this result was a success."""
           # The hasattr check is for test_result's OldResult test.  That
    
    1. Indeed when I put a return before self.collectedDurations.append((test, elapsed)) , all is OK
    $ ./python -m unittest test.test_concurrent_futures.ProcessPoolSpawnFailingInitializerTest.test_initializer 2>&1
    .
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ran 1 test in 0.398s
    
    OK
    
    1. I found out with some debugging and print that on the failed case (collectedDurations.append) the resource_tracker is called before the sem_unlink which will try to unlink them later and fail, since the resource tracker already did it. Only 3 semaphore objects are failing here, trying to unlink after addDuration function.
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-4lu9pdgs
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-61ynpjfw
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-wrenmqfa
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-e01eptc5
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-sssjxme9
    0.27s run addDuration
    Lib/multiprocessing/resource_tracker.py:236: UserWarning: resource_tracker: There appear to be 3 leaked semaphore objects to clean up at shutdown
    call _CLEANUP_FUNCS semaphore function for /mp-u8k6h3v7 file
    call _CLEANUP_FUNCS semaphore function for /mp-ihqrt4f2 file
    call _CLEANUP_FUNCS semaphore function for /mp-n4h31gcc file
    suite.py(132)run() -> self._handleModuleTearDown(result) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-n4h31gcc
    FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    suite.py(132)run() -> self._handleModuleTearDown(result) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-u8k6h3v7
    FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    suite.py(132)run() -> self._handleModuleTearDown(result) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-ihqrt4f2
    FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
    

    (reduced the output so it will be clearer)
    5. In other hand, when I ignore this line, the sem_ulink for those 3 semaphore objects are called suceesfully after the addDuration function but from another trace

    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-ch65p5qm
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-z2m0y_8x
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-mi_764q8
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-ntvllres
    case.py(638)run() -> self._callTearDown() -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-f5553813
    0.27s run addDuration
    .suite.py(122)test(result) -> suite.py(84)return self.run(*args, **kwds) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-jvota4jy
    suite.py(122)test(result) -> suite.py(84)return self.run(*args, **kwds) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-hxf6fzql
    suite.py(122)test(result) -> suite.py(84)return self.run(*args, **kwds) -> run sem_unlink(name) on /mp-fusub384
    
    1. I'm trying now to understand what caused the resource_tracker to trigger befure the sem_unlink. For now I think that for some reason the sem_unlink from TestSuite line 122 is not reached, and thefore the resouce tracker is trying to release the resources. And later the call to sem_unlink from TestSuite line 132 is trying to run and fails
      image
    2. The key is to understand why when the self.collectedDurations is not empty, it blocks us from cleaning as usual those 3 semaphore objects
  4. bityob commented on Jul 14, 2023

    @bityob
    Contributor

    Ok, found more -
    The leaked semaphore objects are from FailingInitializerMixin (as @sunmy2019 mentioned before, but now it's clearer for me).

    image

    This line creates a new queue with 3 semaphore related and when the collectedDurations is not empty the self.log_queue is not released (still in used I guess)

    ################
    FailingInitializerMixin.setUp: Calling self.mp_context.Queue()
    Queue __init__: Set self._rlock = ctx.Lock()
    Add semlock to register and finalize self._semlock.name='/mp-lnmmngl0', self.__class__.__name__='Lock'
    Queue __init__: Set self._wlock = ctx.Lock()
    Add semlock to register and finalize self._semlock.name='/mp-5fhxbfsv', self.__class__.__name__='Lock'
    Queue __init__: Set ctx.BoundedSemaphore(maxsize)
    Add semlock to register and finalize self._semlock.name='/mp-8mzh94sd', self.__class__.__name__='BoundedSemaphore'
    ################
    

    Still investigating

  5. shailshouryya commented on Jul 14, 2023

    @shailshouryya
    Contributor

    For some additional context, I also ran git bisect and landed on the same commit identified above. I did not get as far as the post above me did in terms of identifying the exact reasons why the 6 leaked semaphore objects were not cleaned up before shutdown, but I also narrowed down the problem and found the 6 leaked semaphore objects warning goes away when the following block (also mentioned above):

        def addDuration(self, test, elapsed):
            """Called when a test finished to run, regardless of its outcome."""
            # support for a TextTestRunner using an old TestResult class
            if hasattr(self, "collectedDurations"):
                self.collectedDurations.append((test, elapsed))
    

    is completely commented out:

    #    def addDuration(self, test, elapsed):
    #        """Called when a test finished to run, regardless of its outcome."""
    #        # support for a TextTestRunner using an old TestResult class
    #        if hasattr(self, "collectedDurations"):
    #            self.collectedDurations.append((test, elapsed))
    

    Another thing that I found interesting was the leaked semaphore objects look like TemporaryFiles:

    /mp-ch65p5qm
    /mp-z2m0y_8x
    /mp-mi_764q8
    /mp-ntvllres
    /mp-f5553813
    

    However, I'm not sure about this, since it does not look like TemporaryFileis called anywhere in test_concurrent_futures.py except for

    from tempfile import TemporaryFile
    with TemporaryFile(mode="w+") as f:
    but this does not look relevant for the problem here (but I'm adding this observation here in case it is relevant).

  6. bityob commented on Jul 14, 2023

    @bityob
    Contributor

    @shailshouryya

    Not related to TemporaryFile, those are virtual files used by each semaphore object as the system locking mechanisem

    Accessing named semaphores via the file system
    On Linux, named semaphores are created in a virtual file system, normally mounted under /dev/shm

    Source: https://linux.die.net/man/7/sem_overview

    For example, if you stop the process in the middle

    image

    you will be able to see those virtual files here

    image

    which will be deleted on _multiprocessing.sem_unlink method

  7. bityob commented on Jul 14, 2023

    @bityob
    Contributor

    Ok, found how to fix the issue! 🚀

    Full details

    The current code calls self.collectedDurations.append((test, elapsed)) on addDuration method (as wrote in previous comment).

    This causes the 3 sempahors of FailingInitializerMixin.log_queue to not being released before the resource tracker is stopped and clear by itself all left resources.

    Example 1 (without .collectedDurations.append), the ResourceTracker is stopped after we clear the 3 semaphors -

    image

    Example 2 (current code), the ResourceTracker is stopped before we clear the 3 semaphors -

    image

    This happens since we call _run_finalizers() after resource_tracker._resource_tracker._stop()
    image

    So, optional solution No.1 will be to change the order of the calls, like this -

    image

    And it solves the issue perfectly
    image

    @vstinner -
    I saw that you were the one who wrote this part,
    Can we do such change?
    If yes, I'll make a PR for it.

    @iritkatriel -
    I'll happy to here what you think here, thanks.

    Still open question for me, is why the objects are not finalize normally (by the gc I assume) like it was before.
    I'm still investigating on this

  8. bityob commented on Jul 15, 2023

    @bityob
    Contributor

    Hey,

    Found better solution and also what's happening here.

    The reason those 3 semaphores were still alive and not deleted, it's because there weren't garabage collected yet, since they have a reference.

    How?

    Those 3 semaphors are related to FailingInitializerMixin.log_queue object (they are created as part of this queue).

    This mixin is used to create the test class ProcessPoolSpawnFailingInitializerTest which was used on the test result private object collectedDurations, and since the result object continue to live after the test object ended, the test object can't be collected and therefore the semaphors too...

    Why we need the test object there?

    For displaying it on unittest.runner._printDurations method.
    image

    So how to fix it?

    Very simple, instead of passing the test object, we just need here the test repr only!

            if hasattr(self, "collectedDurations"):
                self.collectedDurations.append((str(test), elapsed))

    And this works perfect! 🚀

    I'll create a PR for this
    @iritkatriel

  9. iritkatriel commented on Jul 15, 2023

    @iritkatriel
    Member

    Good find!

  10. added 4 commits that reference this issue on Jul 15, 2023
  11. 16 remaining items

  12. added a commit that references this issue on Sep 19, 2023
  13. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 5, 2024
  14. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 21, 2024
  15. encukou commented on Feb 22, 2024

    @encukou
    Member

    That PR was a helper to make failures like this easier to diagnose.
    The issue itself is not fixed; it still appears in refleak tests (./python -m test test_concurrent_futures -R:).

  16. added a commit that references this issue on Mar 4, 2024
  17. zuliani99 commented on Mar 19, 2024

    @zuliani99

    I get the same error in my case. I'm doing distributed training using spawn multiprocessing and DDP, also at the end of running my application I get a specific number of leaked semaphores.

    This is the link of the issue.

    I'm wondering if this issue is solved or not.

  18. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 17, 2024
  19. added a commit that references this issue on Jan 22, 2025
  20. added
    3.12only security fixes
    3.13only security fixes
    3.14bugs and security fixes
    and removed
    type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
    on Mar 22, 2025
  21. added
    3.15bugs and security fixes
    and removed
    3.12only security fixes
    on Aug 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    3.13only security fixes3.14bugs and security fixes3.15bugs and security fixestestsTests in the Lib/test dirtype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions