Repository navigation
Add π to the math module #103172
Description
Activity
I think that 🥧 is a much better name! It looks tasty!
Reacted by Abhinav SrivastavaReacted by JosephSBoyle, Konstantin Rasputin, Shashwat, Kumar and Ben MorganReacted by Alex Waygood, Desiders, Eric Fahlgren and ರಾಹುಲ್Worth backporting to 2.7!
Reacted by Alex Waygood, JosephSBoyle, Shashwat, decorator-factory, An Long, Kumar, Clément Robert, Barney Gale and Cool GuyReacted by Barney GaleYea, I was really surprised when realized that my keyboard has only π, but not "p" and "i". That's why i still don't use python when i do some rocket science.
Reacted by Swarnodip Nag, kvrvgv, Abhinav Srivastava and KumarPython supports unicode characters such as π and we don't take advantage of this enough. We can use π, therefore we should.
I concur wholeheartedly with this. We should look for other opportunities to
impose our will uponmake life easier for all users, so suggest we use Σ to replace the 'sum' builtin.Reacted by Stefane FermigierSounds pretty irrational to me.
Reacted by Lewis Gaul and Boštjan MejakReacted by Lewis Gaul, Stefane Fermigier, Abhinav Srivastava and Sam SulaimanovEveryone should write in the margins that using such a symbol is not reflecting the reality of the situation. As you are writing a finite symbol, but when you read and evaluate such a symbol your brain should never return. This is true of many such symbols where we fudge maths, e, 1/3, inf, etc.
And λ to replace 'lambda', of course.
Plus 🐍 instead of 'Python'.
Reacted by Ijtaba HussainAnd λ to replace 'lambda', of course.
Plus 🐍 instead of 'Python'.
but we don't use "python" anywhere in the code. It's neither builtin or keyword.
Where’s the PR?
Reacted by Alex Waygood, denballakh, wookie184, Jelle Zijlstra, Charlie Zhao, Leo Zheng, baseplate-admin and Kumar- added a commit that references this issue
on Apr 1, 2023 On a more serious tone, the "empty set" character (“∅”, U+2205) should be usable to represent an empty set in Python. It currently is not allowed:
Python 3.11.2 (main, Feb 16 2023, 02:51:42) >>> ∅ = set() File "<stdin>", line 1 ∅ = set() ^ SyntaxError: invalid character '∅' (U+2205)I believe it would be useful when working with set-theoretic code, in part because
{}doesn't represent the empty set in Python.Python supports unicode characters such as π and we don't take advantage of this enough. We can use π, therefore we should.
I concur wholeheartedly with this. We should look for other opportunities to
impose our will uponmake life easier for all users, so suggest we use Σ to replace the 'sum' builtin.(Seriously) Note that currently the '∑' (U+2211) character is not allowed as an identifier in Python, so it isn't even doable (assuming it's a good idea):
>>> ∑ = sum File "<stdin>", line 1 ∑ = sum ^ SyntaxError: invalid character '∑' (U+2211)Alas! For it is no longer April 1, and what had yesterday seemed like a revelatory idea, now seems, uh, foolish.
Thanks for the excellent April Fool's, @JosephSBoyle, it brightened my day :)
Reacted by Charlie ZhaoReacted by JosephSBoyle and Ethan Furman(Seriously) Note that currently the '∑' (U+2211) character is not allowed as an identifier in Python, so it isn't even doable (assuming it's a good idea):
I didn't use 2211, I used Σ \u03a3, which is indeed valid as an identifier. Choose your homographs carefully.
I'd suggest this frivolity end immediately. Beware the ∏thon Secret Underground, who have spies out watching for this sort of @^&E$^^RVO^RVOP*&%^
Currently, the math module in CPython uses the identifier math.pi to represent the mathematical constant π. This breaks user expectations and violates the principle of least surprise.
To improve consistency and readability, I propose changing math.pi to math.π symbol throughout the module. The reasoning for this is threefold:
This change will make the code more intuitive for mathematicians and scientists (at least 99%+ of python users) who are more used to seeing the π symbol, thus reducing cognitive load and allowing them to build more complicated research code.
Python supports unicode characters such as π and we don't take advantage of this enough. We can use π, therefore we should.
Nobody currently knows how to type π, if we make this change users will have to open the math module and copy and paste the variable name - which is a great way to increase the visibility of important module internals that users need to read.
Some would be tempted to create a math.pi alias to maintain backwards compatibility, but I think that would only encourage people to continue using the non-symbolic variable (bad), so I propose simply deleting math.pi entirely (users will get the hint!).
This is a pretty small change so I don't think a news entry is necessary, in fact I think not having a news entry would make this change a sort of cool Easter Egg that users can discover and enjoy!
Kind regards and happy April 1st,
Joe
Linked PRs