Skip to content

gauge.set_function() doesn't work in multiprocess mode #504

Open

Description

@MatthewMaclean

Multiprocess mode's collect() reads the registry files and aggregates metrics that have been written to prometheus_multiproc_dir.

This doesn't work with gauge.set_function() which does not record its value. The provided function is just called during collection.

That means with the following code:

registry = CollectorRegistry()
Gauge("test", "test", registry=self._registry).set_function(lambda: 100)
multiprocess.MultiProcessCollector(registry)

The output will be:

# HELP test test
# TYPE test gauge
test 100.0
# HELP test Multiprocess metric
# TYPE test gauge
test{pid="10705"} 0.0

Current side effects:

  • If any mode other than all or liveall is used, the pid tag won't be included. This results in duplicate metrics being reported to Prometheus. Prometheus currently only uses the first metric it reads, which is non-deterministic due to iteration over the registry's dictionary.
  • If registry=None to avoid double reporting, only the default value of 0.0 is reported.
  • Current way to work around it is to use the mode all and to ignore gauges in Prometheus and with the tag pid.

Proposal:
I'm not sure how you could incorporate set_function into the multiprocess registry and I'm not convinced how useful of a feature it would be. Is it reasonable to add a new multiprocess_mode: exclude which would prevent the incorrect 0.0 value being reported? Or would it be better to just add documentation to recommend using two independent registries?

Activity

  1. brian-brazil commented on Jan 29, 2020

    @brian-brazil
    Contributor

    This classifies as a custom collector, which it's not possible to make work with multiprocess mode.

  2. MatthewMaclean commented on Jan 30, 2020

    @MatthewMaclean
    Author

    Makes sense, I'll look/ask about ways to work around that in the mailing list.

  3. hdost commented on Dec 6, 2022

    @hdost

    Given that multiprocess is getting some traction is it worth re-opening this?

  4. reopened this on Dec 6, 2022
  5. csmarchbanks commented on Dec 14, 2022

    @csmarchbanks
    Member

    I'm still not sure how this could be done in multiprocess mode. You would need to run the function for each process which is not a pattern we have today and would need to integrate with whatever is starting the process I believe. If there is a simpler way I am all ears, but otherwise I think it should probably be kept as closed.

  6. hdost commented on Dec 18, 2022

    @hdost

    Perhaps just documentation or a failure logged. Right now you just have to wonder

  7. csmarchbanks commented on Dec 19, 2022

    @csmarchbanks
    Member

    👍 Documentation on the function is a good idea to avoid confusion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions