Repository navigation
surface methods get too much use, move into the API #53
Description
Activity
Created by: knupel
Hi, @benfry what you mean by move
surface.setSize()in API. If this option is choice. There will be no more possibility to use it in code ? or you mean create a specific Processing methode to call it ? likesurface.setSize()became simplysetSize()I hope you think about this lastoption, because like you have wrote I use a lotsurface.setSize()andsurface.setTitle()in my code. By the way congratulation for the time you take to keep Processing up to date with @sampottinger.Created by: benfry
@StanLepunK No, the opposite of that. They were left in the
surfaceclass because they weren't expected to be used much. Because they get used a lot, we should make them more official than having to introduce this weirdsurfacething to everyday users, i.e justresize()instead ofsurface.setSize()or something like that.Created by: knupel
@benfry "ouf", like will said french guy like me. But I see there is already method
public void setSize(int wide, int high)inpublic class PSurfaceAWT extends PSurfaceNoneI never use it, it don't work ? I ask because here i'm at this time I cannot use Processing :( If something must be coded, this class is it a place to do ?Created by: github-actions[bot]
This issue has been automatically locked. To avoid confusion with reports that have already been resolved, closed issues are automatically locked 30 days after the last comment. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
- locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
on Sep 17, 2024
Created by: benfry
We've been surprised at how much
frame.setResizable()andframe.setTitle()and others are being used, and we should make them into real API.The switch from
frametosurfacebetween 2.x and 3.x was bumpier as a result.Need to clean this up and get better behaviors for all of them:
setSize()is erratic across rendererssetResizable()can we make this a one-time operation insettings()?setTitle()is often used to output the fps of an app (a terrible idea, but there we are) so needs to happen at any time (or limited tosettings()to prevent that usage)