Skip to content

Contributors overview image for the README.md #1490

Closed

Description

@xinemata

Relevant sub-area for this feature?

Accessibility, Other (specify if possible)

Feature details

Feature description

In order to increase Processing 4 contributor community's visibility, it'd be great to follow p5.js' footstep to create a "contributors overview image" that can represent all Processing 4 contributors. This image could be used in contexts like such as Processing's README.md or Processing Foundation's people page. See p5.js' readme as a parallel example.

p5.js contributors overview image

Benefits

Creating more visibility for Processing contributors.

Challenges

I'm not sure what the challenges may be.

Additional context

For p5.js, this feature was created through #8237.

Would you like to help implement this feature?

No, I’m just suggesting the feature

Activity

  1. added theissue type on Mar 27, 2026
  2. catilac commented on Mar 30, 2026

    @catilac
    Collaborator

    Oh great idea! I'm going to put this link here too: https://github.com/processing/processing4/blob/main/CONTRIBUTORS.md

  3. removed their assignment
    on Mar 30, 2026
  4. susan-t commented on Mar 30, 2026

    @susan-t

    @xinemata Hi! I'm new and would love to work on this issue! If it’s available, could I?

  5. catilac commented on Mar 30, 2026

    @catilac
    Collaborator

    @susan-t make a suggestion for how you would approach it and i'll assign!

  6. Hemant210 commented on Mar 30, 2026

    @Hemant210

    Hi! I’d love to work on this issue. I’ll start by exploring how p5.js implements the contributors overview image and propose a similar approach for Processing4.

  7. susan-t commented on Mar 30, 2026

    @susan-t

    I would have the same approach as @Hemant210. Would love to work on it with them if it works out?

  8. Hemant210 commented on Apr 2, 2026

    @Hemant210

    Hi @susan-t , great to see we're on the same page!
    Maybe we can explore this separately and keep sharing our ideas and progress here?

  9. catilac commented on Apr 3, 2026

    @catilac
    Collaborator

    I'm going to assign this to @kjhollen, we had a discord conversation and i would like this be taken care of sooner than later.

    Moreover, I want to be clear that no solution has actually been proposed.

  10. added 6 commits that reference this issue on Apr 3, 2026
    0b94060
    fcfffea
    a2232da
    b40040b
    4d282fe
    7194bdc
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Apr 17, 2026
  12. catilac commented on Jun 5, 2026

    @catilac
    Collaborator

    This is completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions