Skip to content

docs(roadmap): bring the housekeeping lane in step with the issues - #83

Merged
plainprogrammer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
083-roadmap-issue-sync
Oct 13, 2026
Merged

plainprogrammer merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
083-roadmap-issue-sync

Conversation

@plainprogrammer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Brings docs/roadmap.md and the GitHub issues back in step, as the roadmap's "Tracking" paragraph asks. Docs only; no issue was closed, reopened, relabelled, retitled or commented on.

What changed in docs/roadmap.md

Only the housekeeping lane.

Dates are the day each issue closed, in the repository's time zone (UTC-4).

Milestone

Set to "1.0 — First Major Release" on #65, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81 (open) and on #73, #74 (closed, so the milestone's history is complete). Every open issue with a theme: or housekeeping label is now on it.

Checked and found in step

Decisions for you

  1. Do No way to start or cancel while a rate-limited job waits to retry #77–Scryfall client retries inside the 30 seconds a 429 limits access for #81 belong in 1.0? They are in the lane and on the milestone because the tracking rule puts every candidate there. None was ruled on. A second refresh can ask the source while another waits out a rate limit #78 and Scryfall client retries inside the 30 seconds a 429 limits access for #81 concern staying inside Scryfall's rate limit; No way to start or cancel while a rate-limited job waits to retry #77, A hung art build reads "Interrupted" with a disabled button #79 and Art index panel hides the reason and time while its retry waits #80 are admin-page gaps.
  2. Decide whether fading unowned card tiles fits Scryfall's image guidelines #65 still needs its ruling: does the 45% fade on unowned tiles stay?
  3. (plan) Identify and design catalog source and model for comic books #23 is on the 1.0 milestone. The comics research is deferred (ruling 26) and ruling 22 dropped comics from the milestone's title. Should the issue come off the milestone? Left as it is.
  4. Tighten bin/image-smoke's catalog:status check #19 and Local image builds contain the OCR engine twice (/rails/vendor/v7.0.0) #31 will drift again when PR fix(image): one OCR engine per image, and an exact smoke check #82 merges. That PR closes both and doesn't touch the roadmap. Either add the two "Done" notes to PR fix(image): one OCR engine per image, and an exact smoke check #82 or to a follow-up. They are listed as open here, with no note about the PR, so that this file isn't wrong the moment fix(image): one OCR engine per image, and an exact smoke check #82 merges.
  5. Item 2 (Define the export format #37) reads "Done 2026-10-11"; the issue closed on 2026-10-12 when PR docs(export-format): define the versioned export format (spec 017) #68 merged. The line was written the day the format was ruled on. Left as it is.
  6. The lane now mixes open and done entries. Eight of its nineteen are done. If you would rather drop finished housekeeping from the file, or move it under its own heading, say so; I kept each entry in place, as theme A does.

Verification

  • Read the lane against gh issue list --state all and each closing PR's merge date.
  • bin/ci passed: 1347 examples, 0 failures, 1 pending (the art agreement spec, which needs COLLECTOR_ART_AGREEMENT).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

plainprogrammer and others added 2 commits October 13, 2026 18:07
Issues #34, #35, #60, #61, #62 and #63 are closed. Each entry now says when it was done and by which spec or PR, as theme A's finished items do.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds #65, #73 and #74 (both done by PRs #75 and #76), and the five follow-ups from the reviews of those PRs: #77, #78, #79, #80 and #81.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@plainprogrammer plainprogrammer self-assigned this Oct 13, 2026
@plainprogrammer
plainprogrammer merged commit e0c0665 into main Oct 13, 2026
4 checks passed
@plainprogrammer
plainprogrammer deleted the 083-roadmap-issue-sync branch October 13, 2026 22:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant