Skip to content

No Release Tag Pushed since 4.1.0 #587

Open

Description

@rohanKanojia

Hi guys,

I'm from @fabric8io team. We maintain Kubernetes and Openshift Client which is used by a lot of people in the java ecosystem. We generate Kubernetes/Openshift model from go structs in api and origin. Right now our Openshift go struct model is pointing at v4.1.0[0], but I have noticed that no other tag has been pushed since then. Even Openshift 4.3.0 got released recently.

I'm just curious why Openshift upstream maintainers are not pushing tags. It's not like we're blocked as we can update model to latest master revision. But it would be nice if we upgrade with respect to
Openshift releases.

[0] https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

Activity

  1. rohanKanojia commented on Mar 10, 2020

    @rohanKanojia
    Author

    @deads2k @smarterclayton @bparees @soltysh : polite ping, Would appreciate it if you could share your thoughts on this.

  2. soltysh commented on Mar 10, 2020

    @soltysh
    Contributor

    It's still in-progress, there are several dependencies we need to handle before we'll be able to publish those.

  3. openshift-bot commented on Oct 2, 2020

    @openshift-bot

    Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

    Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
    Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
    Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

    If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

    /lifecycle stale

  4. added
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Oct 2, 2020
  5. marun commented on Oct 21, 2020

    @marun
    Contributor

    So long as this repo remains untagged, the workaround can be go get with the desired branch name (e.g. master, release-x.x) and go.mod will pin to the SHA of the branch head.

  6. rohanKanojia commented on Oct 21, 2020

    @rohanKanojia
    Author

    Yeah, we're managing with that till now. But we can't provide accurate compatibility matrices with respect to openshift versions

    https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client#compatibility-matrix

  7. openshift-bot commented on Nov 20, 2020

    @openshift-bot

    Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

    Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
    Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
    Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

    If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

    /lifecycle rotten
    /remove-lifecycle stale

  8. added
    lifecycle/rottenDenotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
    and removed
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Nov 20, 2020
  9. openshift-bot commented on Dec 20, 2020

    @openshift-bot

    Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

    Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
    Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
    Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

    /close

  10. openshift-ci-robot commented on Dec 20, 2020

    @openshift-ci-robot

    @openshift-bot: Closing this issue.

    Details

    In response to this:

    Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

    Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
    Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
    Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

    /close

    Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

  11. kaovilai commented on May 19, 2023

    @kaovilai
    Member

    How long does this repo plan to remain untagged?
    /reopen
    /lifecycle frozen

  12. openshift-ci commented on May 19, 2023

    @openshift-ci
    Contributor

    @kaovilai: Reopened this issue.

    Details

    In response to this:

    How long does this repo plan to remain untagged?
    /reopen
    /lifecycle frozen

    Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

  13. added
    lifecycle/frozenIndicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
    and removed
    lifecycle/rottenDenotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
    on May 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lifecycle/frozenIndicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions