doc: Add TSC minutes for 2016-06-16

doc/tsc-meetings/2016-06-16.md

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+# Node Foundation TSC Meeting 2016-06-16
+
+## Links
+
+* **Audio Recording**: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9ebH9A75AA
+* **GitHub Issue**: https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/106
+* **Minutes Google Doc**: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WMrf2OmU11zqlu9SAHeKq8dwH1CSnW-eavLZ8kPCAJo>
+* **Previous Minutes Google Doc**: <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O-nRwKhmKG_vpyGkzlhFe5m5qi-H81cB6nagL4d_7Yw>
+
+## Present
+
+* Rod Vagg (TSC)
+* Alexis Campailla (TSC)
+* Jeremiah Senkpiel (TSC)
+* Michael Dawson (Observer)
+* Bryan Hughes
+
+## Agenda
+
+Extracted from **tsc-agenda** labelled issues and pull requests
+from the **nodejs org** prior to the meeting.
+
+* Regular roll-up reporting for active working groups
+  [#109](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/109)
+* Add @nebrius as a member of the TSC
+  [#108](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/pull/108)
+* Define "Node.js core" [#84](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/84)
+
+## Review of last meeting
+
+### nodejs/build
+
+* OS X buildbots/ci: call to action [#367](https://github.com/nodejs/build/issues/367)
+
+### nodejs/TSC
+
+* Define "Node.js core" [#84](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/84)
+* Meetings every two weeks?
+* Roll-up reporting
+
+## Standup
+
+* Jeremiah Senkpiel: NodeConf.
+* Rod Vagg: CTC repo, work on TC39 relationship, work on Electron relationship
+* Michael Dawson: No specific TSC related business
+* Bryan Hughes: Facilitation discussions at NodeConf
+* Alexis Campailla: no specific TSC related business
+
+## Minutes
+
+### Regular roll-up reporting for active working groups [#109](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/109)
+
+* Rod: we need to figure out if this is worthwhile, then which
+  working groups and how frequent.
+* Jeremiah: what.s the overlap with the regular blog posts
+  that we.re doing on the nodesource.com ?
+* Rod: this would be getting the groups to report for themselves,
+  and also be a chance for evangelisation and talking about future-facing things.
+* General discussion and agreement that its a good thing to do.
+
+We want to give option to all groups to provide an update but there
+are some we'd plan to chase if we don't get updates.  This List
+would linclude: (not exclusive):
+
+* LTS
+* Diagnostics
+* Inclusivity
+* Build
+* Benchmarking
+* Website
+* Testing
+* Documentation
+
+Projects:
+
+* citgm
+* node-gyp
+* nan
+* libuv
+* nodejs-github-bot
+
+* CTC: big-picture things, releases, important decisions made
+
+Logistics
+
+* Bryan: maybe have more regular reporting for TSC & CTC.
+* Rod: we could couple it with the TSC meetings,
+  finalise content and report every two weeks.
+* Discussed where to report: nodejs.org blog
+* Discussed how to collect reports: ask the WGs to decide
+  how and who to collect this information.
+
+How frequently to report:
+
+* Monthly or quarterly or two-monthly? Feels
+  like 3 months is too long but some concern that
+  every month might be hard to make happen.  One
+  suggestion was to do monthly but not necessarily
+  include reports from all groups. We decided to 
+  take this back to github for more discussion.
+
+What to ask from the groups:
+
+* What.s happened, what.s on the horizon
+* Provide suggested options about how they
+  can collect information.
+
+### Add @nebrius as a member of the TSC [#108](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/pull/108)
+
+* Rod reiterated his comments from #108 and why there.s been a delay.
+* Took a vote, got 3/3 endorsing @nebrius, Rod to chase up more votes on GitHub.
+
+### Define "Node.js core" [#84](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/84)
+
+* Discussed ideas that have been raised so far and how we make progress.
+* Michael: maybe we rephrase the question to ask what is the area
+  on which the TSC has authority and autonomy around ?
+* Discussed the option of having a basic definition + 
+  a list of projects that are included.
+* Rod: the board is likely to be cooperative if we wanted to expand anyway.
+* Michael to start a new issue to rekindle the discussion with a strawman
+  list of projects that would fit under .node core..
+
+## Q/A
+
+* William Kapke made suggestions about how to collect reporting.
+  and getting WGs to assign a secretarial role.
+* Josh Gavant commented that it.s not currently clear how
+  TSC membership is qualified.
+
+## Next Meeting
+
+2016-06-30