Repository navigation
Collaborator nomination - gdams #21934
Description
Activity
@nodejs/collaborators
just for clarity, @ChALkeR, @addaleax, @richardlau, @targos, @thefourtheye and @benjamingr have thumbed-up
(for the future, please comment instead of reacting)
+1
- addedmetaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.tsc-agendaIssues and PRs to discuss during Technical Steering Committee meetings.Issues and PRs to discuss during Technical Steering Committee meetings.
on Jul 22, 2018 @devsnek Is there any particular reason you prefer commenting/is this documented somewhere?
Reacted by Benjamin Gruenbaum@addaleax after enough people react you have to use the api to see the full list
edit: i'm not trying to say you shouldn't react, just make sure if you want to be explicit that you also comment.
@devsnek it is unfortunate that it is impossible to +1 without pinging people - I'm also not aware of the process around the +1s at all like Anna. I just thought we were being kind to the nominee and showing we acknowledge their contribution and are 👍 on adding them.
In any case - +1
+1
+1
Ok, to be explicit: +1
+1
(for the future, please comment instead of reacting)
I'm not against people commenting if they want to explicitly endorse a collaborator nomination, but my person opinion is that a
+1post on its own is just noise, especially since the process around nominations is based on there not being any objections and is not a vote (i.e. the+1's don't influence the outcome of the process):If there are no objections raised by any Collaborators one week after the issue is opened, the nomination will be considered as accepted. Should there be any objections against the nomination, the TSC is responsible for working with the individuals involved and finding a resolution. The nomination must be approved by the TSC, which is assumed when there are no objections from any TSC members.
https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/GOVERNANCE.md#collaborator-nominations
But in any case since I am commenting +1 from me (with a disclaimer that I work in the same office/team as @gdams at IBM).
Reacted by Gibson Fahnestock, Nikita Skovoroda, Benjamin Gruenbaum, mary marchini, Gireesh Punathil and Timothy Gu+1
+1
Thanks for the nomination @mhdawson! 🎉
This happened in #22236.
Reacted by Richard Lau and Benjamin Gruenbaum
I'd like to nominate George Adams as a collaborator.
He has been active in the CiTGM, Build and core repos over the last year.
PRs in Node core
Comments on Issues and PRs in Node core
PRs in Build WG
Comments on Issues and PRs in Build WG
PRs in CitGM repo
Comments on Issues and PRs in CitGM repo