This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Sep 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
Node.js Foundation Modules Team Meeting 2018-06-20 #126
Description
Time
UTC Wed 20-Jun-2018 19:00 (07:00 PM):
| Timezone | Date/Time |
|---|---|
| US / Pacific | Wed 20-Jun-2018 12:00 (12:00 PM) |
| US / Mountain | Wed 20-Jun-2018 13:00 (01:00 PM) |
| US / Central | Wed 20-Jun-2018 14:00 (02:00 PM) |
| US / Eastern | Wed 20-Jun-2018 15:00 (03:00 PM) |
| London | Wed 20-Jun-2018 20:00 (08:00 PM) |
| Amsterdam | Wed 20-Jun-2018 21:00 (09:00 PM) |
| Moscow | Wed 20-Jun-2018 22:00 (10:00 PM) |
| Chennai | Thu 21-Jun-2018 00:30 (12:30 AM) |
| Hangzhou | Thu 21-Jun-2018 03:00 (03:00 AM) |
| Tokyo | Thu 21-Jun-2018 04:00 (04:00 AM) |
| Sydney | Thu 21-Jun-2018 05:00 (05:00 AM) |
Or in your local time:
- http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Node.js+Foundation+Modules%20Team+Meeting+2018-20-06&iso=20180606T19
- or http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=07PM+UTC,+Jun+20,+2018+in+local+time
Agenda
This meeting is to discuss transparent interop with the goal of informing and coming to a decision on if-any-transparent interop should be possible (by default, or by loader, or by otherwise). Please keep in mind transparent interop is a large umbrella. We should clarify and make clear distinctions about what we are discussing (one sided, two sided, etc.).
Other Items:
- governance: s/pull request/issue for new members (governance: s/pull request/issue for new members #128)
- Pull request opened for import.meta.require on core (Pull request opened for import.meta.require on core #130)
- Have presentation on loaders. (Have presentation on loaders. #135)
- Add features list to README (Add features list to README #134)
Invited
- Modules team: @nodejs/modules
Activity
GeoffreyBooth commentedon Jun 20, 2018
Can we carve out 3 minutes to hopefully approve #128 and #134? Basically to see if we have unanimous consent to merge them in. If anyone has any objections, we can leave the PR open and punt the discussion into the next meeting.
ljharb commentedon Jun 20, 2018
I believe that we don't need unanimous consent; we need quorum (50%) of the 28 voting members.
benjamingr commentedon Jun 20, 2018
An old friend reached out to me about meeting today and it might cause me to miss the meeting - if you have anything to vote on other than the two issues let me know (and I hope we do @bmeck's presentation on loaders so I can catch up on that with the video )
bmeck commentedon Jun 20, 2018
@benjamingr I think that slide deck is not easily fit into the current meeting where we are still discussing transparent interop and what it means (ESM importing CJS, CJS requiring ESM, or bi-directional). That topic will be a rather large one on our agenda and the deck I have takes a good 30minutes to run through.
ljharb commentedon Jun 20, 2018
Could we get a meeting link?
mhdawson commentedon Jun 20, 2018
I think the same one should be good from last last time. Looking for it.
mhdawson commentedon Jun 20, 2018
https://zoom.us/j/656987750
demurgos commentedon Jun 20, 2018
Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIdJMD42ZGs
MylesBorins commentedon Jun 20, 2018
@robpalme the meeting just ended :(