You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
confusing order of stacked PRs in PR description #41
Even though the order follows the same pattern as when looking at commits with git log, it may be confusing for reviewers to see stacked PRs in reverse order.
It would be confusing to some people no matter which way we choose, and adding an option can made it even more confusing if one has to review stacks from people with different order settings. So far the design principle we've sticked was to mimic what git does, so I'd say we should stick with the current way and don't change it.
It would be confusing to some people no matter which way we choose
Apologies for chiming in a year later, but it occurred to me that in either case this confusion would be resolved if something visual existed to indicate where main is in the stack.
Activity
GiorgosAlexakis commentedon Oct 15, 2024
@ZolotukhinM what do you think we should do?
I can help by writing code if needed.
ZolotukhinM commentedon Oct 17, 2024
It would be confusing to some people no matter which way we choose, and adding an option can made it even more confusing if one has to review stacks from people with different order settings. So far the design principle we've sticked was to mimic what git does, so I'd say we should stick with the current way and don't change it.
smudge commentedon Aug 28, 2025
Apologies for chiming in a year later, but it occurred to me that in either case this confusion would be resolved if something visual existed to indicate where
mainis in the stack.Something like:
Stacked PRs:
mainor:
Stacked PRs:
mainWDYT?
ZolotukhinM commentedon Nov 16, 2025
That might be a good idea!