Skip to content

Baselining smaller changes in transformation-based emit - #7814

Closed
Daniel Rosenwasser (DanielRosenwasser) wants to merge 2 commits into
transformsfrom
512-acceptable-baselining-transforms
Closed

Daniel Rosenwasser (DanielRosenwasser) wants to merge 2 commits into
transformsfrom
512-acceptable-baselining-transforms

Conversation

@DanielRosenwasser

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

function C234() {
this[0] = 1;
this[0.0] = 2;
this[0] = 2;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is an error, it should be using the raw literal text. I have a similar issue with binary/octal integers I need to investigate. I wouldn't accept the baseline for this file.

@rbuckton Ron Buckton (rbuckton) added the Domain: API: Transforms Relates to the public transform API label Apr 4, 2016
@mhegazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Daniel Rosenwasser (@DanielRosenwasser) do not think this is needed any longer. if this is not true, please update.

@mhegazy
Mohamed Hegazy (mhegazy) deleted the 512-acceptable-baselining-transforms branch April 18, 2016 21:47
@microsoft Microsoft (microsoft) locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 19, 2018
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Domain: API: Transforms Relates to the public transform API

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants