Give template strings a different classification type #6513
Description
At the time, we just used "stringLiteral" because it was such a PITA to sync between the managed side and whatnot. We never followed up on it. Prompted by #6508.
Open questions:
- Do we want to classify
${and}specially? - If we do want to classify
${and}specially in templates, do we want to classify backticks? - What colors do we want to use in VS?
Activity
derekcicerone-zz commentedon Jan 16, 2016
Thanks for checking. I don't have a strong opinion on the highlighting for string templates. It never hurts to have more specific classifications though - worst case we can keep coloring as strings. The syntax coloring I'd still really like is to distinguish between a normal comment and JSDoc.
basarat commentedon Jan 17, 2016
I am very happy with what is there currently in the syntactic analyzer (the one between lexical and semantic) 🌹 that I am using as a work in progress in alm.tools