Skip to content

5.3: const-like inference of arrays no longer requires readonly modifier #57217

Closed

Description

🔎 Search Terms

5.3 const type parameter const like array readonly

🕗 Version & Regression Information

EDIT: replace my unintuitive attempt at indicating a range of versions for clarity - This changed between versions 5.0.4, 5.1.6, 5.2.2 and 5.3.3, 5.4.0-dev.20240129

  • This changed between versions 5.2.2 and 5.3.3

⏯ Playground Link

https://www.typescriptlang.org/play?ts=5.3.3#code/MYewdgzgLgBADgJwKYDcCWICuEBCSAWAhuiAjALwwA8oksAKjEgB5RJgAmEMyhH4AGwCeMaAjRgA5gG0AugD4AFFABcMegEoK8mFADcAKFrRdSaAAVkJbBXhWM2PERIJF0gEQAzECHeyNhgD0gTChMAB6APwGRuAmYEgA7k7EGGSUNHEMTKzsXKJQ4lJySqrqWuQ6+rF0ptAAckm2CckEqaRuXj5+AQbBYRGRQA

💻 Code

const previousBehavior = <const T extends readonly string[]>(t: T) => t;
const testPrevious = previousBehavior(["foo"]);
//    ^?

const newBehavior = <const T extends string[]>(t: T) => t;
const testNew = newBehavior(["foo"]);
//    ^?

🙁 Actual behavior

newBehavior is able to infer t as ["foo"] on 5.3+.

🙂 Expected behavior

I would expect newBehavior to infer t as string[] as it did on previous versions and a readonly modifier must be used to infer ["foo"] (well, technically, readonly ["foo"]), as is mentioned is required on the pull request and announcement that introduced this feature.

Additional information about the issue

I'm curious if this is expected behavior and can be relied upon in future versions. Thanks!

Activity

  1. MartinJohns commented on Jan 29, 2024

    @MartinJohns
    Contributor

    This changed between versions 5.0.4, 5.1.6, 5.2.2 and 5.3.3, 5.4.0-dev.20240129

    I'm having a hard time believing it really changed between each of these versions.

  2. fatcerberus commented on Jan 29, 2024

    @fatcerberus

    The change was intentional: #55229

  3. conorbrandon commented on Jan 29, 2024

    @conorbrandon
    Author

    Thank you for the quick reply and apologies for the duplicate issue. Feeling silly my search terms didn't find #57107, removing "5.3" from the search terms finds it🤦.

  4. locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators on Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions