Skip to content

tsconfig.json should support multiple configurations #37884

Open

Description

Search Terms

multiple configurations, transitive closure

Suggestion

When using multiple packages in a monorepo, it is common to have a tsconfig.shared.json that all packages extend in their individual tsconfig.json. The current system makes it difficult to support various build configurations across packages (such as "dev" vs. "prod").

Because a property named "config" seems redundant in a file named tsconfig.json, I'll borrow the term select from Bazel and propose the following new option in a tsconfig.json file for defining configurations:

// tsconfig.shared.json
{
  // Via "select", we define two configurations: "universal" and "modern".
  "select": {
    "universal": {
      "compilerOptions": {
        "target": "es3",
        "downlevelIteration": true,
      },
    },
    "modern": {
      "compilerOptions": {
        "target": "es2019",
      },
    },
  },

  // These compilerOptions are common to both configurations.
  "compilerOptions": {
    "sourceMap": true,
    "module": "esnext",
    "moduleResolution": "node",
    "lib": ["dom", "es5", "es2019"],
    "strict": true,
  },
}

To complement this, tsc would have to support a new --select flag:

# Assume tsconfig.json extends tsconfig.json and defines "include" and "references".
# This would build the modern configuration.
$ tsc --build --select modern -p tsconfig.json

Ideally, it would also be possible to parameterize paths such as outDir so that you could also define this on the base compilerOptions in tsconfig.shared.json:

"outDir": "./dist/${select}/",

though I haven't been able to get "outDir" to do what I want in tsconfig.shared.json in my own project, so there might be more work to do on that front.

Use Cases

I want to be able to have a shared tsconfig.json that defines multiple configurations in one place that can be shared across multiple modules, as opposed to the current situation where we need O(M ⋅ C) tsconfig.json files where M is the number of modules and C is the number of configurations. A detailed example is below.

Examples

I have a Yarn workspace where each package is under the modules/ folder, so my root package.json contains the following:

{
  "workspaces": [
    "modules/*"
  ],
  "scripts": {
    "compile": "tsc --build modules/*"
  }
}

I also have a shared.tsconfig.json in the root of my Yarn workspace where I define the "compilerOptions" that I want all packages in the workspace to use. (For example, I set "target": "es2019" in shared.tsconfig.json.) Each folder under modules/ contains its own tsconfig.json file that contains the line:

  "extends": "../../tsconfig.shared.json",

and there is also a "references" property with the appropriate list of relative paths to other packages in the workspace.

Ideally, each such tsconfig.json would contain only "extends" and "references", but it seems I have to redeclare "compilerOptions.outDir" and "include" in each of these files even though the values are the same in each one (["src/**/*"] and "./dist", respectively).

OK, so far, so good, but now I want to be able to build my entire Yarn workspace with a different set of compilerOptions, specifically:

"downlevelIteration": true,
"target": "es3",

Ideally, I would be able to specify this in one place and leverage the "references" I already had to define so I could compile one .ts file or package and all of its transitive deps with these compiler options. (I happen to be using ts-loader in Webpack, so my ultimate output is a single .js file, which perhaps biases my expectations here.)

Unfortunately, there does not appear to be any clean way to do that. I could go through and define a tsconfig.es3.json in each of my packages that looks like this:

{
  "extends": "./tsconfig.json",
  "compilerOptions": {
    "downlevelIteration": true,
    "target": "es3",
  },
}

though even if I did that, I'm not sure I could build all of my modules as ES3 with a one-liner as I did in my original package.json file. Now I'm faced with the additional incidental complexity of:

  • Maintaining O(M) tsconfig.es3.json files and ensuring all of them are in sync.
  • Introducing Lerna or some other tool to "walk my DAG" and run tsc -b -p tsconfig.es3.json or something like that.

With the --select proposal, I could avoid the extra tsconfig.json files and still build via a one-liner:

tsc --build --select universal modules/*

I would expect if any of the tsconfig.json files under modules/* did not define a "universal" configuration, the build command would fail (or at least the strictness should be configurable).

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

  • This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
  • This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
  • This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
  • This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
  • This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.

Activity

  1. mohsen1 commented on Apr 11, 2020

    @mohsen1
    Contributor

    related #21951

  2. ozyman42 commented on Apr 14, 2020

    @ozyman42

    I had a similar problem about a year ago so I built a tool to help manage all the tsconfig.json files in a monorepo. https://github.com/isomorphic-typescript/ts-monorepo
    Currently I'm working on moving it from Lerna to Yarn v2 and adding a templates feature so one config can inherit multiple templates and overwrite the specific values it wants to.

  3. shaman-apprentice commented on May 1, 2020

    @shaman-apprentice

    What do you guys think about supporting a tsconfig.js in addition to tsconfig.json? That way we would be free to build our own sharing / extending of configs through the full power of js. I personally prefer js-configs over json-config as they give me much more freedom and power (at the price of doing stupid mistakes of course).

  4. Alexandre-Fernandez commented on Sep 17, 2022

    @Alexandre-Fernandez

    I'm having a similar problem, not having this feature forces me to have duplicate configs in my monorepo.

  5. nicolas377 commented on Sep 17, 2022

    @nicolas377
    Contributor

    What do you guys think about supporting a tsconfig.js in addition to tsconfig.json? That way we would be free to build our own sharing / extending of configs through the full power of js. I personally prefer js-configs over json-config as they give me much more freedom and power (at the price of doing stupid mistakes of course).

    The team took a stance on that here, but I haven't looked to see if anything's changed about their stance since then.

  6. Nantris commented on Sep 22, 2022

    @Nantris

    I don't see how we're supposed to use TypeScript in cross-platform code in conjunction with babel-module-resolver-plugin without support for multiple configs via tsconfig.js or some other approach.

    For example:

      import { someFunc } from 'zlib-platform';

    In Node this resolves to zlib-node and in React Native this resolves to zlib-rn, but we're stuck with just "Cannot find module 'zlib-platform' or its corresponding type declarations." because we can't tell TypeScript how to resolve the modules.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Awaiting More FeedbackThis means we'd like to hear from more people who would be helped by this featureSuggestionAn idea for TypeScript

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions