You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Should leading ampersands (&) be allowed in intersection types? #17916
The spec hasn't been updated since January 2016, so it's likely that a bunch of stuff is missing or outdated. I'm not sure why this is; my guess would be time pressure on the team, and the fact that they don't directly take PRs for the spec. Perhaps a team member can chime in.
Automatically closing this issue for housekeeping purposes. The issue labels indicate that it is unactionable at the moment or has already been addressed.
Activity
[-]Is this a bug?[/-][+]Wierd intersection type / Is this a bug?[/+][-]Wierd intersection type / Is this a bug?[/-][+]Weird intersection type / Is this a bug?[/+]yortus commentedon Aug 19, 2017
Junyoung/"Clare" Jang (@Ailrun) it is by design. See #12386. The spec might need updating though.
Ailrun commentedon Aug 19, 2017
Troy Gerwien (@yortus) Why don't anyone try to fix the spec? Isn't specification of language the most important document?
yortus commentedon Aug 21, 2017
The spec hasn't been updated since January 2016, so it's likely that a bunch of stuff is missing or outdated. I'm not sure why this is; my guess would be time pressure on the team, and the fact that they don't directly take PRs for the spec. Perhaps a team member can chime in.
ikatyang commentedon Aug 21, 2017
See #17215 (comment).
Ailrun commentedon Aug 21, 2017
Troy Gerwien (@yortus) Alright... thank you for your answer!
Ika (@ikatyang) Thank you for information!
[-]Weird intersection type / Is this a bug?[/-][+]Should leading ampersands (&) be allowed in intersection types?[/+]mhegazy commentedon Sep 6, 2017
Automatically closing this issue for housekeeping purposes. The issue labels indicate that it is unactionable at the moment or has already been addressed.