You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From what I can see, this project extracts IDL fragments from W3C TR version of the W3C specs, when in most cases, the most uptodate view of what the IDL should be reside in editors draft.
I also wonder if it would help to have releases of reffy-reports that have certain guarantees, like all of the IDL being possible to parse with a given version of webidl2.js.
Activity
foolip commentedon Jan 21, 2020
From https://github.com/microsoft/TSJS-lib-generator#when-should-a-dom-api-be-included-here it sounds like the number of implementations is an important consideration. This unfortunately can't be determined on a per-spec basis as most specs contain some mature parts and some things yet to be implemented.
Perhaps combining IDL with https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data would help here.
I also wonder if it would help to have releases of reffy-reports that have certain guarantees, like all of the IDL being possible to parse with a given version of webidl2.js.
saschanaz commentedon Mar 20, 2020
Definitely a good-to-have, but I wonder what made you open this issue. Is this a blocker for anything?
saschanaz commentedon Sep 17, 2021
#1034
@github-actions close
github-actions commentedon Sep 17, 2021
Closing because Kagami Sascha Rosylight (@saschanaz) is one of the code-owners of this repository.