Skip to content

[API review] Revisit the naming of the annotations property to avoid confusion with the term used in JSON Schema #1966

New issue
New issue
Closed as duplicate
Task
Closed as duplicate
[API review] Revisit the naming of the annotations property to avoid confusion with the term used in JSON Schema#1966
Task
Labels
priority:p2Medium. Generally has a work-around and a smaller sub-set of customers is affected. SLA <=30 days
Milestone
v2-Preview17

Description

@RachitMalik12
Rachit Malik (RachitMalik12)
opened on Nov 26, 2024

The issue here: #1719 introduced the annotations name for a different use case, but it also conflicts with the annotations in the JSON-Schema. Evaluate a rename to make it clearer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    priority:p2Medium. Generally has a work-around and a smaller sub-set of customers is affected. SLA <=30 days

    Type

    Task

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions