You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Run sn -vf DistributedLock.1.5.0\lib\net45\DistributedLock.dll
Expected:
The sn.exe tool would output
Microsoft (R) .NET Framework Strong Name Utility Version 4.0.30319.0
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Assembly 'DistributedLock.1.5.0\lib\net45\DistributedLock.dll' is valid
Actual:
The sn.exe tool outputs
Microsoft (R) .NET Framework Strong Name Utility Version 4.0.30319.0
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
DistributedLock.1.5.0\lib\net45\DistributedLock.dll does not represent a strongly named assembly
@madelson Hi, could you please release version 1.5.1 (or 1.6.0) that is identical to 1.5.0 and is strongly named. So we don't need to wait and migrate to new version only to get strongly named assembly.
Since adding a strong name to an assembly is a binary breaking change, I won't be able to merge this into the 1.x series.
I am currently working on the 2.0 version (see the 2.0 branch) which is intended to have strong-named assemblies. Would you consider performing this change on the 2.0 branch and filing a PR against that branch?
@maxkoshevoi the alpha02 versions of releases should be fairly stable (tests are passing, no major further breaking API changes planned) and have strong names.
Activity
maxkoshevoi commentedon Dec 17, 2020
@madelson Hi, could you please release version 1.5.1 (or 1.6.0) that is identical to 1.5.0 and is strongly named. So we don't need to wait and migrate to new version only to get strongly named assembly.
pedropaulovc commentedon Dec 23, 2020
@maxkoshevoi This is what @madelson said in #48 :
madelson commentedon Dec 23, 2020
@maxkoshevoi the alpha02 versions of releases should be fairly stable (tests are passing, no major further breaking API changes planned) and have strong names.