Skip to content

How to dispose SqlDistributedLock asynchronously? #20

Closed

Description

@clement911

The using pattern is nice and reads very well.

However, the implicit call to Dispose is doing a synchronous db call and blocking the calling thread so I'd love to see an option to dispose asynchronously, even if it means I can't use the using keyword in my calling code.

I guess SqlDistributedLock .TryAcquireAsync could return an interface like this:

IAsyncDisposable : IDisposable
{
    Task DisposeAsync();
}

What do you think?

Activity

  1. madelson commented on Nov 2, 2018

    @madelson
    Owner

    Hi @clement911 thanks for the suggestion. I agree that this is a good idea. A few thoughts:

    • Changing this would be a binary breaking change, so we would have to do it as part of a 2.0 release
    • It looks like .NET Core is working on a standard IAsyncDisposable interface for this (https://github.com/dotnet/corefx/issues/32640), so I would want to wait for that to be released and understand the implications of it (e .g. can you use it in a using block?) before building this.
    • Finally, some lock releases can't benefit from async (e. g. transaction-based locks release with SqlTransaction.Dispose(), which isn't async. That said, (a) maybe this will change when IAsyncDisposable comes out and (b) it doesn't stop us from implementing the interface for the cases where we will get the benefit.
  2. added this to the 2.0 milestone on Nov 2, 2018
  3. clement911 commented on Nov 3, 2018

    @clement911
    Author

    Makes sense. Looking forward to IAsyncDisposable!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions